November 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Birth defect—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 13:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pseudomyrmex ferruginea—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm WindTempos. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to SpaceX—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. WindTempos (talkcontribs) 11:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at O'dell Owens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Skylar130 (talk) 14:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dawaf (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheAafi was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: nonsense
The Aafī (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Dawaf edit

 

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Dawaf has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2023 edit

  Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gary Paulsen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Paulsen. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gary Paulsen was changed by 71.11.10.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919721 on 2024-01-11T12:42:17+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gary Paulsen, you may be blocked from editing. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gary Paulsen. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Ternera. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Strange Fruit—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ternera (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Arctic fox, you may be blocked from editing. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2024 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Plattsburgh, New York, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 14:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anglican Communion, you may be blocked from editing. CCWikiMan (talk) 15:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ... discospinster talk 15:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply