70.89.155.226

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to David Hume, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, William James, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Best of all possible worlds— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LakesideMiners^{My Talk Page} 16:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bonobo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:28, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Seattle, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 02:53, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Existentialism. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of people from Seattle. Wikipelli ^Talk 20:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thigh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 01:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Little Women (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. QueerFilmNerd^talk 21:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to A Little Woman

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, A Little Woman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to French people have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: French people was changed by 70.89.155.226 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971307 on 2021-03-04T22:40:21+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:40, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

---