Welcome! edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Decent interval. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (68.199.42.28) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! (t · c) buidhe 21:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


DYK for Decent interval edit

On 24 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Decent interval, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a historical theory argues that Nixon sought a decent interval between American withdrawal and South Vietnamese collapse to avoid becoming the first president to lose a war? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Decent interval. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Decent interval), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bare Trees—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Hail Mary pass, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Engr. Smitty Werben 12:22, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Texas v. Pennsylvania. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Merry Christmas! Asartea Talk Contribs! 15:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply