September 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Hervé Jaubert, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Howdy

edit

Editing out entire well referenced paragraphs when a change of language would suffice, borders on vandalism and seems like an excuse to censor content.

Noticeably contributions from following users have been largely focused on few articles with similar edit pattern. If it is same person behind these, please consider having an account or logging in before editing.

2605:6000:E914:6C00:A584:195B:EDF5:3DE3

2605:6000:E914:6C00:F1AB:EEE7:6B05:1757

Ohsin 17:05, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

An untrue statement referred to paragraphs were not well referenced and in some cases articles that were used as a citation did not even include statements that were derived from it.

NPOV

edit

You seem to be under the impression that the article is a forum for responding to criticism. It is not. It is not a venue for presenting counterpoints. The article is about criticism, not your own responses to it. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:02, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

it is a well sourced edit and changes to this can only be of political nature. I was ensuring a neutral viewpoint as the article before my changes treated the fringe opinion of an author as a fact.
No, you are engaging in original research. That is not allowed here. See Wikipedia:No original research. Your viewpoint is far from neutral. The criticisms don't have to be neutral and need no responses; criticism is the subject of the article after all. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Anachronist. Please read WP:TPO. Anachronist can remove messages from their talk page if they like. You cannot revert that unpunished. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Then why allow this? That makes no sense.