62.28.64.102

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

02:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (62.28.64.102) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 23:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Frankie Ingrassia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you made a change to an article, James, Viscount Severn, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 15:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at David McCallum, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Binksternet (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. KylieTastic (talk) 20:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 06:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jessica Rothe has been reverted.
Your edit here to Jessica Rothe was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://ethnicelebs.com/jessica-rothe, http://ethnicelebs.com/jessica-rothe, http://ethnicelebs.com/jessica-rothe, http://ethnicelebs.com/jessica-rothe) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kendall-K1 (talk) 05:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kendall-K1 (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Guilt (emotion). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 20:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Note

Can you please start using edit summaries to explain your changes? People think they're vandalism and you're likely to wind up blocked if an admin can't figure out why you're changing things. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

I never had that problem before, but OK... 62.28.64.102 (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

See here. You were reported for vandalism. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Unexplained, unsourced edits

@Shellwood and NeilN: This editor seems to have knowledge about Marx. Much of the problem stems from lack of edit summaries.

• Albert Göring I see that the change was correct and self-reverted
• Jenny von Westphalen No idea where this came from
• Edgar von Westphalen First instance of name change. No idea of accuracy.
• Charles Longue Was reverted by RA0808 addition of unsourced
• Jenny Longuet Was reverted by Shellwood. I restored. This editor's change matches body. Shellwood reverted back w/ reason.

More recent changes

• Carin Göring Name change, unexplained, unsourced.
• Nils von Kantzow Marriage now agrees with source. Son Thomas unsupported by source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim1138 (talk • contribs) 01:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138 and Shellwood: For Jenny Longuet the infobox does not match the article text. Can someone clarify? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@NeilN and Shellwood: Shellwood said in his second revert that they were not in London at that time. I left a note on Shellwood's talk page re the discrepancy. Jim1138 (talk) 01:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your edit to Nils von Kantzow

Per wp:verifiability, please wp:cite (or mention) a wp:reliable source that von Kantzow's son was named "Thomas". I don't see it mentioned in ether source. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Adding references can be easy

Just follow the steps 1, 2 and 3 as shown and fill in the details

Hello! Here's how to add references from reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain the Wikipedia policy of verifiability.

Adding well formatted references is actually quite easy:

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite". Click on it.
2. Then click on "Templates".
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the web URL (or "website link") becomes inactive in the future.
4. Click on Preview when you're done filling out the 'Cite (web/news/book/journal)' to make sure that the reference is correct.
5. Click on Insert to insert the reference into your editing window content.
6. Click on Show preview to Preview all your editing changes.

• Before clicking on Save page, check that a References header   ==References==   is near the end of the article.
• And check that   {{Reflist}}    is directly underneath that header.

7.  Click on Save page. ...and you've just added a complete reference to a Wikipedia article.

You can read more about this on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.
Hope this helps, --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

• To use this message, place {{subst:User:Shearonink/ref}} on User:talk pages when needed.

December 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Sutherland, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 18:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Sutherland. Kendall-K1 (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please note IMD.b is not considered a reliable source by Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 19:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Donald Mackay, 1st Lord Reay

I undid your edit to Donald Mackay, 1st Lord Reay as it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. To add a reference, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. There is a tool that can help: See wp:RefToolbar/2.0. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Please add references when you restore the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:52, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Donald Mackay, 1st Lord Reay, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 20:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Zocke1r. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pope Alexander III, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zocke1r (talk) 11:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Kendall-K1 (talk) 12:33, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent addition of poorly sourced content. Please note that wikis are not reliable sources.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DrKay (talk) 14:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Aleksandr Vlasov (politician), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mahveotm (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Xavier de Villepin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Xavier de Villepin, you may be blocked from editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 20:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Cassidy. Eric ^talk 03:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kendall-K1 (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.28.64.102 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked under the acusation of adding unsourced content. Although that has been the case in previous situations involving me, something I truly and already intended to avoid in the future, in this last one isn't. If you check my last edits, you'll see that they're mostly clean ups and that I have added more sources in articles where I've added any content. The only person who made the complaint in the Incident Board was someone who disagreed with me adding links to the ethnicity of Jack Cassidy, under the pretext that they were "common words", without knowing most other articles on other people have the same linkings, and kept removing them. In turn, and instead of invoking that, he used the false argument of my previous actions, which was taken face value by the Administrator without proper check of the facts. That editor is the one who not only is a vandal but also used false accusations to make his point prevail. 62.28.64.102 (talk) 03:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It is clear that you either can't or won't understand what is being said to you, and that you have no intention of changing your approach. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I recognized my mistake and stated I'd change, and I'm being insulted and called a liar and kept blocked on that ground? 62.28.64.102 (talk) 15:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

More than one editor reverted your changes to that article. One of the reverts included a link to MOS:OVERLINK. Your talkpage demonstrates that your IP's activity on Wikipedia mostly generates clean-up work for the rest of us. Eric ^talk 13:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

I have to review that from my part, although I've already been doing that more. But that doesn't make the reverters right in that particular case, since, as I've noticed, other articles have the very same links without any contestation. 62.28.64.102 (talk) 16:46, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

The fact that those terms are wikilinked in other articles does not necessarily mean that they should be. It would help if you considered how many anglophones, upon encountering the word Irish — especially in a sentence stating the ancestry of a man named Cassidy — are going to wonder what the word means. Eric ^talk 18:28, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

It's not a matter of "meaning", since the article isn't a dictionary one, but a link to the History and characteristics of the ethnic group. 62.28.64.102 (talk) 01:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Danielle Savre have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Danielle Savre was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://ethnicelebs.com/danielle-savre) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Danielle Savre. You have been warned repeatedly in the past about this kind of editing. Consider this a final warning. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Danielle Savre. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Danielle Savre was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://ethnicelebs.com/danielle-savre, http://ethnicelebs.com/danielle-savre) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:46, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:30, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

---