46.61.152.186

April 2015

Hello, I'm Jackfork. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Third party (United States), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jackfork (talk) 01:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

All based on elections results anf linked to proper pages. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 12:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to satellite, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Supdiop (talk) 11:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please, be attentive at fast reverts. I'm eliminated planned and contributed carried firsts. First Belgium sats (cubesats) launched in 2014 but forgotten here. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 12:20, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at City Sightseeing, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

All page already have request that more source need. Such source-tag no need and no duty after any word and any sentence. Despite of that, for constructive work and exact content of Wiki, if you doubt about some sentence please add source-tag after it rather than eliminate sentence and add question in page's talking page. Also, please be careful at total reverts, that uses against vandalism, and no delete undoubtful contributions such the new illustrations, the detailed signs (years) at illustrations, the excluding of tautology (global-global), the wikification, and so on. It's as for formally.

As for matter, I think you and all others, in order of consensus, must agree that, with 100+ cities in 30+ countries, SC really worlds largest such net while second one, The Big Bus Company, much-much smaller. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 06:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to City Sightseeing. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I see you were warned earlier this month.  :-( Elvey^(t•c) 03:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please, stop the total revert without talking and with elimination of undoubtful technical and other edits. You warned. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 07:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

"World's largest" sentence now cited especially for non-seeking a consensus and non-accurate wikipedians-totalreverters who mistrustful, not believing to the own eyes, want demands that non-duty strongly after each word in WP, no see common Undue tag and no use special CN tag at first. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 09:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm Wesley Mouse. Your recent edit to the page Template:Eurovision Song Contest appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wes Mouse ✒ 10:10, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Dear Wikipedian. All additions no differs from listed already other ESC attempters like non-independent Scotland, Faroe and former USSR etc. Almost all of them had no registered formal claims on ESC participation - only talking about it or EBU participation. These cases cited in linked main page and linked further pages. Inline-citing no applicable in templates. If you or others have a doubts, it may open the discussing about each on talk pages of template or of linked pages and put source-need tags more in linked pages. But attempts term, indeed, was some unclear and now replaced by attempts and intentions and linked main page some detailed by explanation. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Eurovision Song Contest, you may be blocked from editing. Wes Mouse ✒ 10:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of countries in the Eurovision Song Contest. Wes Mouse ✒ 10:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Eurovision intentions

Please refrain from re-adding multiple countries to the feature article, List of countries in the Eurovision Song Contest. Such additions and the use of the term "intentions" goes against the rules on speculation, and what Wikipedia is not about. All of the content was written in very poor English, and I am going to provide a breakdown of each of the countries you added and explain why they cannot be included.

1. Catalonia: The were no citations to any reliable sources in order for the content to be verified as being warranted any form of inclusion. The fact that Catalonia only wished to take part, but never made any attempts to submit an applicatin to the EBU, means that this nation cannot be included in the article.
2. Czechoslovakia: This nation never sent a submission to the EBU to participate, nor did they televise the contest. They did, however, take part in the Intervision Song Contest, which is an entirely different contest whatsoever.
3. Gibraltar: Gibraltar cannot take part in the contest, because they are a British Overseas Territory, and broadcast the contest via the BBC. They too have never sent any application to participate, or show any desires to take part either.
4. Northern Ireland and Wales: They are both part of the United Kingdom.
5. Palestine: They haven't even made an application to be a member of the EBU. Therefore they cannot have shown any intentions to participate, nor have they made any applications to take part.

Before you think about adding any of them back into the article, I strongly suggested that you open a discussion at Talk:List of countries in the Eurovision Song Contest, in order for a consensus to be reached. Although it is unlikely that an agreement to include those countries would ever be reached. Regards, Wes Mouse ✒ 03:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

OGAE poll results

Please stop with the disruptive editing or you may be blocked from editing without further warning. The titles on each column for the OGAE Poll on the article OGAE are correct and agreed upon by consensus. What you done was very very wrong and goes against the Wikipedia Rules. Also we NEVER add the current year's poll results to that particular article until ALL of the 40 OGAE clubs have voted. The only article that has the results updated as each vote is cast is the annual Eurovision article, which in this case is Eurovision Song Contest 2016#OGAE. If you continue to be highly disruptive and ignore all advice and warnings that fellow Wikipedian users issue you, then you will leave me no option other than to report you to an administrator. Take this as your final warning! Wes Mouse ✒ 09:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm Quinto Simmaco. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Satellite without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Dear user/bot. No just looks on decreasing size of page. It's no mistake and no deletion, it's actualisation, was explained already and now explained more. 46.61.152.186 (talk) 16:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Goose121. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Universal Rocket have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. goose121 (talk) 15:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alania, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 12:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---