May 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to North East Lincolnshire, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kenneth Williams, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The next time you make a reference, include the website inside. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 08:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Burnham-on-Sea, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lia Nici. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to We All Stand Together have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. (CC) Tbhotch 20:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Is There Something I Should Know?, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Anytime you add (or see) something like "worst (or best or biggest or smallest) of all time", it's a sign that a solid source is mandatory. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 15:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2021 England and Wales police and crime commissioner elections—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Crystal Tipps and Alistair, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 07:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to There's No One Quite Like Grandma. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 07:25, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to PS Waverley, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Pipsally (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cleethorpes Pier, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Freddie Frinton. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Fenty, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: John Fenty was changed by 46.235.175.53 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850962 on 2021-07-18T07:29:14+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Patrick Allen, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 06:39, 4 August 2021 (UTC)Reply