42Grunt

42Grunt, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 42Grunt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Landship and Landcraft articles

Dear 42 Grunt, thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia! I see that you have taken an interest in topics related to landships and landcraft. I am concerned that these articles don't conform to Wikipedia practice, as you'll see in my comments at Talk:Landship#False premise for article and Talk:Landcraft. I welcome your replies to my concerns at those talk pages. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Landcraft

The article Landcraft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page. There is no indication that any of the topics listed are commonly referred to as "landcraft"; the term appears to see next to no use at all. A Google Books search gave mostly personal names.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 00:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Landship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Landships has been nominated for discussion

Category:Landships, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Huon (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Landcraft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Landcraft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landcraft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:18, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Giant stripping shovels has been nominated for discussion

Category:Giant stripping shovels, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Huon (talk) 01:40, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 42Grunt. Thank you for creating Russian armoured train Yenisei. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of XGC88000 crawler crane

The article XGC88000 crawler crane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article, relies on primary sources. No indication this passes GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  // Timothy :: talk  12:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of XGC88000 crawler crane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XGC88000 crawler crane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XGC88000 crawler crane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  06:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Requests for close

For a start, you made a mistake in your request, in addition it is in the wrong place, Thirdly, no one said you could do anything and fourthly the claim that is also "mispeaking", you said somethingn that was not true, not once but more than once. In other words, you have wholey misrepresented the situation, which is exactlly I it can and shoulds only be closed by an uninvovled party.

This is also why I want to wait untill the war is over, so clear heads can decide what happend.

Read wp:cir. Slatersteven (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

• So you actually put all the extra effort to go to my talk page to regurgitate what was already said and done on the discussion page. I already told you about the miscommunication and I am willing to wait for those with authority to decide on the closure of the RFC as well as the input of third-parties. So exactly what is the point of this comment? Because this feels unnecessary. 42Grunt (talk) 03:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
  • To tell you what you did wrong, and to advise you to take more care. In a hot topic area innocent mistakes take on a whole new look. So I am advising you not to give that look. 10:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
• I know. I don't need a reminder. I had been in past edit wars myself in other wikis, so I am well accustomed to dealing with heated topics. 42Grunt (talk) 13:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 - adding false info

Greetings! Please don't add false information not supported by sources as you did at Battle of Avdiivka (2023–2024): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia : "presumed to be incredibly heavy", "whose claims has been verified to be authentic" is not in source, and your "in the best case scenario" inclusion is "for Russia", which you omitted. Thanks! ManyAreasExpert (talk) 12:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)