January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Accrington has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Hair. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Suburb have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. HairTalk 20:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Dani Alves— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Sergio Agüero, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:43, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cheshire Cat— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Scavengers (game show)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Scavengers (game show). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dark-World25 (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Owen Brown— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Sakura Cartelet. Your recent edit to the page John Bickerton appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sakura CarteletTalk 23:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2019

edit

  Hello. In a recent edit to the page Mortise lock, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 11:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply