Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chad Kroeger, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

April 2008 edit

 

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mobile phone has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg 23:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

The recent edit you made to Mobile phone constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Q T C 00:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC))Reply

 

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to GSM. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Q T C 00:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Electric guitar has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Femtocell has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. wj32 t/c 23:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page 108 (number) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 15:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

March 2009 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barrhead, Alberta, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Barrhead, Alberta was changed by 208.38.59.162 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-02T16:09:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to the page Barrhead, Alberta constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Phil Kessel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Mehrunes Dagon 00:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Paperbacks has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/thepaperbacks (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:27, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

August 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Realtime Worlds, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

February 2011 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 17:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

removing shared IP messages edit

Could you please explain why you are removing shared IP messages? Leaving an edit summary would of course have made this question unnecessary. --Muhandes (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Ten Commandments shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.   — Jess· Δ 21:54, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unacceptable behaviour edit

The userbox you added on my talkpage is unacceptable. Besides I'm not even a he. Please refrain from doing that again.   Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Androzaniamy (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

it doesn't constitute vandalism if you said people can add their own user boxes to your page. i noticed you removed that notice now. Too bad the box lasted a week on your page. Lots of people saw it. 199.126.149.180 (talk) 20:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Cory Monteith do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Cory Monteith was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/CoryMonteith) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2012 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of S postal codes of Canada, you may be blocked from editing. GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Naturama (Futurama), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 18:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Revolution1221. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dare because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 03:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jaguar F-Type, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thomas.W talk to me 17:52, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page All Sport, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to All Sport was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/NHLFlyera) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kidnapping— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 18:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Calgary United F.C. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019 edit

Hello, I'm Yadsalohcin. Thankyou for your contributions of RASTA Animal Sanctuary, Chemainus, Freedom Forest Animal Sanctuary, Victoria, and A Home for Hooves Animal Sanctuary, Chemainus at the wikipedia List of animal sanctuaries on 18 October 2017. As I'm sure you'll know, wikipedia likes to have reliable sources referenced for its content, and while I've found something about 2 of these, I can't find anything about "Freedom Forest Animal Sanctuary, Victoria". Can you advise? Yadsalohcin (talk) 13:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019 edit

  Hello, I'm OliverEastwood. I noticed that you recently removed content from Miss Great Britain without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OliverEastwood talk 12:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm ProcrasinatingReader. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shaw Communications, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 00:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Ifnord. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of National Hockey League retired numbers appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 19:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of National Hockey League retired numbers. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 21:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.