205.189.94.13

Old warnings and block notices

April 2012 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grid plan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Orphan Wiki (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2012 (UTC) August 2012 Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of Albanian writers has been reverted. Your edit here to List of Albanian writers was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://elliottmoglica.blogspot.ca/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of Toronto, you may be blocked from editing. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 20:58, 22 August 2012 (UTC) September 2012 This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at List of Albanian writers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:54, 13 September 2012 (UTC) Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elliott Moglica. To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MikeWazowski (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC) MikeWazowski (talk) 21:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC) Legend of dragoon page why do you keep changing the legend of dragoon page. I assume you know that you know lloyd is not the main hero. -Scott- 99.178.136.110 (talk) 02:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC) December 2012 Hello, I'm Mdann52. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to List of rulers of Hungary, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 17:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC) January 2013 This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Thénardiers, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Eyesnore (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Revenge of the Nerds. TBrandley (what's up) 16:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC) To edit, please log in. Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of either form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. April 2013 Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of Fairy Tail episodes, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Yintan  15:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC) This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Legend of Dragoon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. czar · · 00:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  - Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:20, 6 May 2013 (UTC) May 2013 This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 21:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 22:57, 21 May 2013 (UTC) To edit, please log in. Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of either form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC) March 2014 Hello, I'm Optimale. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Agricultural revolution because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Optimale Gu 13:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC) April 2014 Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leann Hunley may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: |''Heaven Help Us (TV series)|Heaven Help Us]]'' It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC) December 2014 Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Riverdale Collegiate Institute— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster talk 20:45, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Riverdale Collegiate Institute with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 20:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cleavage (breasts) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 21:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --The one that forgot (talk) 19:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Alphavoltaics (January 29) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alphavoltaics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors. Primefac (talk) 15:32, 29 January 2015 (UTC) April 2015 Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to HAL Tejas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SarrCat ∑;3 18:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC) Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of First Nations people— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TL22 (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Draft:Alphavoltaics concern Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alphavoltaics, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC) October 2015 Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Immune system, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2015 (UTC) Draft:Alphavoltaics concern Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alphavoltaics, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Alphavoltaics Hello, 205.189.94.13. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Alphavoltaics". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 13:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC) To be added this ISBN under 'Bibliography' section, at the end of paragraph that starts with "Rama, ...." ISBN 978-99284332-0-6 July 2016 Hello, I'm Donner60. An edit you recently made to I Spit on Your Grave seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 20:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Friday the 13th Part III, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 21:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Happy Birthday to Me (film). Donner60 (talk) 21:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Canadian women in the World Wars have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (talk) 23:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Lose the blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

205.189.94.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is a branch of the Toronto Public Library system, specifically the Hillcrest branch in North York. Based on the fact that "Scarborough" (a different borough) has already been mentioned, you are currently blocking an entire city's worth of computers because of one shithead. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You've provided no reason to believe the block evasion has ended. But don't worry, the block won't affect you, so long as you sign in. Yamla (talk) 18:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for being an asshole, Yamla. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.189.94.13 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

This comment shows the wisdom of the block. Anyone who wishes to contribute constructively, from this library, simply has to create an account. I note that there have been no less than 10 blocks and I see no merit in a long series of relatively short blocks. In the circumstances I am extending the block and, as stated below, any further abusive remarks will result in the loss of talk page privileges. Just Chilling (talk) 20:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

205.189.94.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Penalizing an entire library community over the actions of one guy is totally asinine. 205.189.94.13 (talk) 19:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

(1) It is unfortunate that the only way we can stop disruptive editing in this situation is by blocking an IP address, which has collateral effects on other editors, but unfortunately the only alternative is to sit back and permit disruptive editors to destroy the encyclopaedia. (2) I know exactly what it is like to find that one can't edit Wikipedia from a public library computer as a result of a block caused by other people, because that once happened to me. I didn't sit there typing messages accusing the administrators of being "assholes" and "asinine". Instead I accepted that there were good reasons for the block, even though it was inconvenient for me, and I created an account. I have never suffered from the effect of a block again. (3) I wouldn't assume that all the problems were caused by one "guy". Most public library IP addresses are the source of endless vandalism from many people. (4) Experience over the years shows that editors who use childish name-calling and personal attacks in one context (such as requesting an unblock) are unlikely to become decent civil cooperative editors in other contexts. Probably for that reason, in my seven years as a Wikipedia administrator I have not once seen anyone unblocked as the result of an unblock request that attacks or denigrates the administrator who placed the block. (5) One more personal attack will be likely to lead to talk page access being removed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

14:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
MalnadachBot (talk · contribs)

---

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Just Chilling (talk) 20:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments: Blocked for 2 years.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

205.189.94.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Just because the admins at enwiki are a gang of notoriously incompetent, power-crazed bunglers, it is no reason to block the entire Toronto Public Library system. You clowns should resign en masse and let somebody real take over. Dear Jimbo, fire these petty tyrants. Thanks in advance, and thanks for conceiving of Wikipedia, in spite of its current gross mismanagement.

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked, as you were warned above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. El_C 00:28, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

---