User talk:1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR/Archives/2016/September

WikiProject PHP

-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Nice work

Nice work on the Infonautics article. It shows that company articles can be neutrally written and well sourced. Thank you for your work on the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 11:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Regarding your username

I know you have probably gotten many messages with this title before, but I am NOT telling you to change your name. It is how did you get your username? Keyboard smash? Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 11:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Oh, a keyboard smash would of been much quicker and easier to create! Actually, the username is a base58 hash of an ECDSA public encryption key, also known as a personal bitcoin address. Generating it took a long time in order to get the '1Wiki' characters in the front of the hash. Of interest, the Ledger (journal) is picking up on this practice of using personal bitcoin addresses for identification and verification. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Haha! That's cool! But on the other hand, it has caused pings to be completely unusable.BTW, has anybody sent money to you via your username? Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 11:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

There is also an easier to write User:1Wiki8 - an un-used alternative account created during the 2015 RFC/NAME discussion about my username[1]. I sent a few test transfers to the address myself, details in the blockchain[2]. All tests coins were consolidated a few months ago and sent to 1Dvnze9nqUZt2gS72qh17R1CyHXhy36vnd[3] which now holds a grand whopping total of 0.02070332 BTC. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 11:55, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

I figured it had to be a bitcoin address when I saw your username. I have experience in Bitcoin addresses myself. I currently own like 2 addresses at the moment. Yoshi24517^Chat _Online 22:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Taco trucks on every corner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taco trucks on every corner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taco trucks on every corner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Codacy has been accepted

Codacy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

hmm... current version is a lot different then the stub I started[4], but ok. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Shitposting for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shitposting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shitposting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 20:16, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

• News and notes: Wikipedia Education Program case study published; and a longtime Wikimedian has made his final edit

• In the media: Wikipedia in the news

• Featured content: Three weeks in the land of featured content

• Arbitration report: Arbcom looking for new checkusers and oversight appointees while another case opens

• Traffic report: From Gene Wilder to JonBenét

• Technology report: Category sorting and template parameters

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC)