November 2011

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marouane Chamakh, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shuipzv3 (talk) 10:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marouane Chamakh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shuipzv3 (talk) 10:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marouane Chamakh, you may be blocked from editing. Shuipzv3 (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

February 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Carl Lewis, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. mmovchin Talk 13:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

edit

Hello, 194.81.238.226, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 10:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tuber, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 12:41, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Smtchahal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:How to start a new article, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Smtchahal (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ciphertext has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Python (programming language). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Encryption, you may be blocked from editing. Sideways713 (talk) 11:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Common shiner. — MusikAnimal talk 16:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages, as you did with Legan Green. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Randor1980 (talkcontributions) 16:21, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits to The Times

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to The Times. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Davy lamp— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Marine iguana has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Oakwood Park Grammar School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 22:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sherlock (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. LOL BUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE WILL HAVE TO REMAIN UNDER A BUSHEL FOR THE NEAR FUTURE. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mary Anning— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:26, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mary Anning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Anning, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Anning. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notification: Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:46, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alexander McQueen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tomb of Fu Hao, you may be blocked from editing. Scaledish (Chances are I am wrong, sorry :blush:) (talk) 15:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.