194.176.105.138

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Neil Priestley, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Neil Priestley was changed by 194.176.105.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960766 on 2011-07-18T09:54:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:54, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Boris Rankov with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Atomician (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Bethlem

Hello. You've taken a lot of content about SLam out of the Bethlem Royal Hospital article. Is that because you don't think SLaM stuff is relevant to the article? I don't have a strong position one way or the other but I do like to know the reason when a fair bit of content is removed. I'd be grateful if you'd let me know on my talk page why you deleted it all. The edit I refer to is this one. --bodnotbod (talk) 10:26, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Your recent edit to the page Greater Manchester Combined Authority with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   12:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

January 2012

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Tube challenge. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ocarina has been reverted.
Your edit here to Ocarina was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4AiLFa--aw) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Epigram (newspaper) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Epigram (newspaper) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/#!/search/#BurrowsBorrows) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:Tube Challenge. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012

Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Andrés Guardado without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 10:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Vrenator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Emily Bishop, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Vrenator ^talk 08:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, I'm O.Koslowski. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Grandfather paradox, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, O.Koslowski (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Geoffrey Hayes

It's obviously possible for an innocuously boring unverified statement to become, years later, a questionable statement that should be checked before being reprinted in an encyclopaedia. If you think his "close friendship" with Savile is important and should be in the article, you need to provide a source to back it up. --McGeddon (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Hello, I'm Shadowjams. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Ewing's sarcoma, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Shadowjams (talk) 20:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Serum sickness, you may be blocked from editing. Stifle (talk) 21:08, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to 'Obby 'Oss festival, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, T4B (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Football Manager 2013. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gilliam (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Umpire Decision Review System, you may be blocked from editing. Dricherby (talk) 08:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ham and cheese sandwich because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ellie howell concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ellie howell, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ellie howell

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ellie howell, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JMHamo (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm Fayenatic london. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Claire (given name), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Fayenatic London 15:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loser (hand gesture). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Your edits to February 21

Some of your edits on the page February 21 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 04:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Neil— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 15:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm Avono. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to University of Shimane— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Avono♂ (talk) 14:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm PhilKnight. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Gospel of Barnabas— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bank— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 10:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bank with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 10:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bank with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 10:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bank. DVdm (talk) 10:19, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  – Gilliam (talk) 10:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2015

Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Photography and the law because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Alternative medicine, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Kamwe

Please read the talk page about adding garbage to the article. — kwami (talk) 17:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm Wikiisawesome. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Poltergeist— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. /wia /tlk 17:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2018 FIFA World Cup, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 11:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

Hello, I'm MRD2014. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Culture of Iceland— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MRD2014 T C 14:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Amphitheatre , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:54, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, I'm Snood1205. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Glascwm have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 14:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

194.176.105.138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hey, this is the IP address for a hospital, so I was wondering if it might be possible to unblock the IP address, as I assume the person who caused the block originally has since been discharged, and I was trying to create an account.

Decline reason:

Nope, sorry. There's been vandalism stretching back almost seven years. However, if you'd like an account, you can get one created for you at WP:ACC. Yamla (talk) 10:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2018

Hello, I'm Alpha3031. I noticed that in this edit to Louise Day Hicks, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

---