Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Daim has been accepted

edit
 
Abdul Daim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Abdul Daim for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Daim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Daim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Philip Rycroft— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Principal & Vice-Chancellor has been accepted

edit
 
Principal & Vice-Chancellor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Weight training— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vitamin E. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Quantum, you may be blocked from editing. — Anita5192 (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)Reply