Vandalism warning edit

Please desist from vandalizing Wikipedia as you did with the Dolly Parton page, or you may be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 21:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Madison Bumgarner has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madison Bumgarner with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2014 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Order: 1886 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

July 2015 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Matt Ruth has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Matt Ruth was changed by 161.150.176.4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951706 on 2015-07-30T20:35:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:35, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm Amccann421. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kareena Kapoor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amccann421 (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mandie Kay (June 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! 161.150.176.4, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 23:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Mandie Kay concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mandie Kay, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wedding soup— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 15:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Egg drop soup. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 15:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mandie Kay edit

 

Hello, 161.150.176.4. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mandie Kay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

February 2018 edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Andhra Ikshvaku does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018 edit

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kamma (caste). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Politrukki (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lincoln Place (Pittsburgh), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply