Copying within Wikipedia edit

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Tamar of Georgia. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 13:48, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the tip, I didn't know about that. 149.3.83.160 (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Willking1979. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Pharasmanes I of Iberia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Willking1979 (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to stop the vandalism. 149.3.83.160 (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Vakhtang's invasion of Ossetia, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply