December 2023 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at My Little Eye. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 17:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brooklyn Nine-Nine (season 8), you may be blocked from editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brooklyn Nine-Nine (season 8). AntiDionysius (talk) 02:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm REDACTED403. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jamie Marchi—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -REDACTED403 (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Jamedeus. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cat-Tails for Two without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 21:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. oknazevad (talk) 02:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. AlphaBetaGammsh (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2024 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at New Tang Dynasty Television, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:MrSchimpf. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 21:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you recently removed content from WGBH-TV without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 02:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 14:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WGBH-TV. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

User talk page behavior edit

I see at User talk:Dipper Dalmatian that you have been repeatedly adding the same complaint to the page and demanding that they not delete it. Per WP:BLANKING, a user is allowed to delete material from their own talk page.

You seem to have a problem with a reversion that they've made on a specific page. Per Wikipedia's standard Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle, if you boldly added material and had it reverted, it is then a time to raise a discussion on the article's talk page and find consensus for the change before re-doing it. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Look at this page, I don't think they are going to Liston.. you might have to block the IP Jena (talk) 15:15, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for harassment and edit warring. See also the filter log.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 17:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2024 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at PlayStation Underground, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 18:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at PlayStation Underground, you may be blocked from editing. see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 22:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.