Biosimilar edit

 

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Biosimilar was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! I also made redirects for Biogeneric and plurals. Graeme Bartlett 04:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

December 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jauerback (talk) 19:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AD/CE edit

Please don't try converting Wikipedia to your dating conventions, unless you get consensus on the Talk page. It only leads to editing wars. Articles dealing with non-Christian subjects especially often use BCE/CE. kwami (talk) 20:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gödöllő castle in the Hungary article edit

Hi, would you mind using an edit summary to explain your reasons for deleting content? Vandals often randomly delete things, and it's hard to tell the difference unless you explain. Moyabrit (talk) 11:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removing references edit

Hi there. Thanks for pointing out that a reference on .dwg was dead; I have now removed it. For future reference, you can do this yourself by going into the actual block of text that the reference is in, and removing the appropriate <ref></ref> tags. This will automatically remove it from the automatically generated reflist. Any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC).Reply

June 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Spore (video game) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 08:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

July 2008 edit

Your edits to July 13 edit

Dear 134.58.253.57,
  Some of your edits on the page July 13 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 11:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your edits, and similarity with the edits of User:Mhuys edit

Seen:

suggests that this IP is used by user:MHuys, and therefor:

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bibliotheca (Pseudo-Apollodorus), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Bibliotheca (Pseudo-Apollodorus), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia.

Please stop and start discussing your edits on talkpages, and let established, uninvolved editors add the information if they deem it suitable. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008 edit

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Talk:CITA2 worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ironholds 13:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to CITA2. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Equendil Talk 13:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mia Hamm. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Mosmof (talk) 22:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States presidential election debates, 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jmerchant29 (talk) 14:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Belgium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2009 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mann–Whitney U, you will be blocked from editing. Navy blue84 (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2009 edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Monica Mendez has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bangelfire\.com\b (links: http://www.angelfire.com/planet/monica_mendez/).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Sint-Jans-Molenbeek worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. ArglebargleIV (talk) 12:32, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from GnuTLS. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please see my edit comment, and read the linked policy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GnuTLS&action=historysubmit&diff=394774134&oldid=387698581 Widefox (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Genetic diversity, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Koduru, Krishna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 08:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ancient Egyptian literature edit

I have undone your edit to this article, because it seemed doubtful, and you did not provide a source. If you can point to a reliable source that says the Egyptians did use duck blood for ink, it can be included. If not, it won't. A. Parrot (talk) 19:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Belgium, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:41, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

April 2012 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to BibTeX. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to BibTeX was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://chenfuture.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/diy-your-bibtex-style-file/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

January 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Esther Ku constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Gasparo Contarini. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Gasparo Contarini was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/GasparoContarini) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:17, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Virani, Iran. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Maxkin (talk) 11:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Silvio Proto with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStartalk 11:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Leuven , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Download. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Draft:Mathijs Franssen, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -download 09:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Draft:Jeroen Clarysse concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jeroen Clarysse, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Jeroen Clarysse edit

 

Hello, 134.58.253.57. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jeroen Clarysse".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Jeroen Clarysse}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 16:14, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Amit Shah without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Thiomargarita namibiensis— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eteethan(talk) 12:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Nero Marokko concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nero Marokko, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of Yale Law School alumni— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 (talk) 12:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nero Marokko edit

 

Hello, 134.58.253.57. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Nero Marokko".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Maurits Smeyers edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Maurits Smeyers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://illuminare.be/archives. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Optakeover. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Matilda (chicken)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 11:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Rakhine State, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

August 2018 edit

The link to the Ortec webpage at the bottom is broken.