August 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tertiary education fees in Australia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear AgisdeSparte
I have made numerous changes to improve the outdated higher education in Australia related articles. After improving Tertiary education in Australia, I also improved the outdated Tertiary education fees in Australia to condense it to the encyclopedic style, bring the updated to the current status, also added useful links in the external links which have been reference in other articles via wikilinks and enchoring.
It seems you might have received some edit-filter triggered automated alert that a large chunk of text has been removed or condensed. If you thoroughly review the edits I made to this article, you will find there's a merit to my edit. The article already had a hatnote tag, which states the article is outdated, that is what I had tried to fix.
Perhaps you did not have much time as you might be busy and you reverted my edits under the presumption that it migha some vandal making troubles. Please review thoroughly and you will find my edits are very useful.
Just in case, if you still want to retain the original History Section, then at least please restore my edits done to the external link section.
Though I prefer you retain all my edits including the edits I made to the History Section, because presently it's difficult to see what is in the past and what is in the current situation, as my edits to history section had condensed the section and clearly differentiate the past with the present situation, and thus my edits to the history section made article more useful to the readers. Hence, I request you to restore all the edits. Thank you.
119.74.238.54 (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
@119.74.238.54 Undone the revert. Have a nice one ! AgisdeSparte (talk) 18:33, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
AgisdeSparte, wow, excellent. Huge thanks to you. 🥰🥰🙏🙏

119.74.238.54 (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Depsang Bulge does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Kautilya3 (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2024 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rani ki Vav, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:SEEALSO for more The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gurugram Heliport Hub (January 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Maliner (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 119.74.238.54! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply