109.106.227.160

Which Stirling numbers of the first kind are prime?

• I know only three of them (in absolute value): 2, 3 and 11. Are there others? Many such numbers have many prime factors.

May 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hexadecimal, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 89 (number), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 11:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021

Hello, I'm ComplexRational. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Beryllium, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 20:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Template:Infobox samarium isotopes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 00:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Concern regarding Draft:Attractive code

Hello, 109.106.227.160. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Attractive code, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Attractive code

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Attractive code, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Need for citations to reliable sources

Well over two years ago you were warned, several times, about the need for citations to sources for content of articles, but you have continued to add unsourced material; in fact as fa as I can see you have never added any citation for any dit that you have done. Some of what you have posted into articles is certainly true, but for some of it I have been unable to find any confirmation. Unfortunately, in an encyclopaedia which anyone can edit, we cannot simply assume that something is true because someone who has decided to edit here says so. Please don't continue to add article content without any indication were that content comes from. If you do continue to do that, you are likely o be blocked from editing by an administrator; in fact it is surprising that that didn't happen long ago, in view of the messages you received about it, and the extent to which you have carried on in the same way. I suggest you have a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources, Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and perhaps also Wikipedia:Verifiability, to see what kind of thing is needed. JBW (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

WP:Citing sources

---