Welcome edit
|
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kazan school, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Kazan+School.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Entire Screen of One Game edit
The article Entire Screen of One Game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kolbasz (talk) 08:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Entire Screen of One Game edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Entire Screen of One Game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MadGuy7023 (talk) 12:27, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
September 2016 edit
Hello, I'm DAJF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Peach John, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 23:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
February 2017 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at PlayStation 3, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You can't update a sales figure from 80 million to 86.46 by just changing the number in the (old) 80 million headline, you need to provide a new source that actually says 86.46. McGeddon (talk) 13:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bōsōzoku. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese street fashion, you may be blocked from editing. —Frosty ☃ 04:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Vento Aureo edit
I left a message for you at Talk:Vento Aureo two days ago. Please read it and leave a response explaining your edits.--IDVtalk 17:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
July 2017 edit
Wikipedia is a collaborative project. It is not acceptable to continually undo another's work without any explanation, and then refuse to engage in any of the discussions or questions about the changes. If you do this anymore, you will be blocked from editing. You need to either engage in discussion, or drop it. Sergecross73 msg me 21:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Please stop making pointless changes edit
Please stop making pointless changes. --19:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
September 2017 edit
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
October 2017 edit
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Noma (restaurant) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Banner talk 08:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mugaritz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 08:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017 edit
Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Noma (restaurant) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Banner talk 08:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mugaritz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 08:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Madchester. Dl2000 (talk) 01:19, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
November 2017 edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)November 2017 edit
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Denis Sinor, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 20:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, 雨宮鏡心. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2018 edit
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lordtobi (✉) 09:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 10:25, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
雨宮鏡心 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello. First of all, I apologize for my edits. But what I need to clarify is that it is not a damage or disruption. I just want to "mark" some articles that are useful to me in order to find them quickly in future writing. Since this behavior has caused misunderstandings and distress, I will not continue to do it. Thank you.
Decline reason:
As previous warnings and block failed to stop you from repeating the same disruptive editing behavior, I see no reason that this behaviour will change in order to lift this block, and Wikipedia is better off to be read-only for you. Alex Shih (talk) 06:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Hi. I won't review this unblock request (for behaviour that appears to have continued for some time, despite an earlier block), but are you aware that you can add articles to your watchlist for future reference? See Help:Watchlist for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
雨宮鏡心 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi. I still apologize first. I can't fabricate a "reason" that all administrators approve, and I don't want to do that either. What I do is to state the facts. I hope that with this fact, let everyone know that my intentions and purpose are not "destructive." Wikipedia is my teacher and friend. I will not destroy it. Obviously, the current behavior is inconsistent with the "rules". This is also the reason why I apologize. The previous "warning" and "blocking" did not attract my attention. Until this time, "blocked indefinitely", I realized that the situation was serious. I am seriously reflecting on myself. I still hope to contribute to the construction of such a great Cathedral, so I also hope that the administrators will not shut me out. Thank you.
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but this is simply not true. Here and here, for example, you say "Why don't you shut up?" (in Spanish). You read the warnings, you acknowledged the warnings, and you expressed quite clearly you don't care about the warnings. As such, it's quite clear you are here to deliberately harm Wikipedia, and based on your attempt to mislead us in your unblock request, I'm revoking talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Yamla (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Sorry, but this is not really convincing: The previous "warning" and "blocking" did not attract my attention. Until this time, "blocked indefinitely", I realized that the situation was serious. In fact, you have removed warnings here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. So without noticing the warnings, you still wiped them out? The Banner talk 08:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)