Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, कलमकार! Thank you for your contributions. I am HindWIKI and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! -- HindWikiConnect 02:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! कलमकार, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! -- HindWikiConnect 02:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
@HindWIKI: Thanks for your nice gesture. Wish you a very Happy New Year.--कलमकार (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rajeev Kumar (politician) edit

Please write a text quoting reliable sources.Xx236 (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

It was under construction at that particular time. Now it's ready with reliable sources. --कलमकार (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Rajeev Kumar (politician) edit

Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. कलमकार, thanks for creating Rajeev Kumar (politician)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is tagged for two isues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 14:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for suggestions. Wish you too a very Happy New Year !!!--कलमकार (talk) 12:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Request edit

Hello, I have got a request from Kalamkar (it is the transliteration of the Devanagari username), who was quite upset after the block.

I met Kalamkar during a Wikipedia workshop on 11 and 12 November in a northern Indian city, which I attended mostly as a resource person and really enjoyed talking to him.

I'll try to tell here a few things keeping WP:OUTING in mind. Kalamkar is working in a news channel, in a northern India city. The office has shared IP address(es), and shared computers also. Some of his colleagues also use/edit Wikipedia.

I know it is quite difficult situation, specially when CUs have evidence. However, I know that "Kalamkar" is a real person, and he edits under this account. He is a very gentle and soft-spoken person. It would be great if we can do something to help him, if he is innocent. --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Titodutta: The best would be for the user to post an unblock request here and disclose as much as he feels comfortable with, particularly technical data. Anything private he can e-mail me, but I need more before I can consider unblocking him. He should focus on the technical. For example, what are the IP(s) he uses at work to edit Wikipedia? Does he also edit Wikipedia using his own ISP? What provider and what are those IPs? What devices does he use at work? What devices does he use when he's not at work?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Hi, Tito Dutta in reply to your ping regarding this, I reported User:कलमकार (Kalamkar) as his style of creating articles was very similar to User:Yavarai and both hovered around this page Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, 2017, as you know Yavarai was a sock of User:Michaellko. Yavarai had come to my attention when he created these two articles Praveen Tiwari and Shrivardhan Trivedi both were promotional. Two days after Yavarai was blocked कलमकार (Kalamkar) was registered, both user pages on the Hindi Wikipedia were similar but कलमकार has since requested it to be deleted. The whole thing doesn't add up as I feel they have not been upfront with their usage of multiple accounts but if you feel कलमकार (Kalamkar) was wrongly blocked I have no objection to his unblocking (I probably don't have a say in it anyway) but if Bbb23 and gab are fine with it am okay with it too. FITINDIA 12:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello,Bbb23 as per your suggestions let me explain my edits at Wikipedia. I really don't know what kind of evidences the CU found with my user ID. However I guess it's the shared IP address I used. To my surprise my used id is identified as shockpuppet of one MICHAELLKO whom I don't know. Similarly with my ID some of my colleagues at 'SAHARA NEWS NETWORK' are also blocked having IDs User:Prem journalist, User:Sudhir kumar sahara samay, User:अंकित तिवारी, User:महेद्र, User:महेन्द्र माही. All these persons are journalist working as SAHARA TV. They were my colleagues when I was with SAHARA. We used to work under one roof and with one IP address. Apart from it I don't have any idea about user:Yavarai. I have only one ID and that is कलमकार (Kalamkaar) mainly active on HINDI Wikipedia. All the admins of HiWi knows me and contributions very well. In no way I am related to any kind of vandalism or multiple account activity. So I request you to kindly look in to the matter and unblock me on English Wikipedia. Regardsकलमकार (talk) 12:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hello,Bbb23 I am still waiting for your reply.--कलमकार (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hello,Bbb23 I hope you will reply positively someday. Best wishes--कलमकार (talk) 10:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

कलमकार (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked one year back alleging that I was involved in shockpuppeteering, however I explained the reason of check-user identifying me shock of some unknown user. Kindly look in to the matter and consider my request for unblock - कलमकार (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry was established and confirmed via technical means, and is not in doubt. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.