 | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
November 2010
Hi
i havent been logged in since February 2010 and wont be Going on the talkpage i suppose i should leave the Retirement message on my talk page since i have no need for wikipedia anymore. MJfan9 (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Removed Twinkle access
Alright, I've removed Twinkle access for you. Today you made 7 speedy deletion requests on images: 3 of them made no sense whatsoever (tagging as a copyvio of a Wikipedia article), 1 was just flatly wrong (the image didn't exist externally), 1 was indeed CSD but not for the reason you stated, and 1 was from a website that took the image from us, which you were just warned about. We've asked you countless times to be more careful, and I warned you a month or so ago I would take action if you weren't more careful. You may continue to edit without the tool only, as you've clearly shown you won't listen to warnings and requests to stop. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:07, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Removed Twinkle access. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- moved from my talk page Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC):
- I'd have preferred it if you did not remove twinkle access and post to the drama boards at ANI.
- I'm pretty sure that those images contained the File:Medina School Seal.jpg, which, if you've bothered to look at the page, is licensed only under non-free content criteria, and as such the copyright belongs to whoever holds the seal, though I cannot find the website. Thus I pointed the admin to that page, as the subsequently tagged images no doubt violate the non-free use rationale, and by extension the copyright for that page/seal.
- :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:59, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I didn't mean to embarrass you or ruin your reputation. I did it more as a check on myself to make sure I wasn't abusing my power. I didn't do it for "drama"'s sake.
- I'm sorry but you didn't make that very clear when you tagged the images - you'll want to include that in the summary. Something like that can be cropped to avoid a copyvio, and would do much better at PUF. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi=
sir give me explanation why you nominate my articles for deletion pls.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halil marx07 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:Sachinvenga/Awaaz Foundation
Hello TeleComNasSprVen, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Sachinvenga/Awaaz Foundation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: That is not a typo but a page move left over, user can ask themselves if they don't want to have them. Some actually prefer to leave this in their use userspace. Nothing to worry about. Tikiwont (talk) 09:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
RfA MfD
I don't blame you for nominating that RfA for deletion; many other RfA's like that are deleted if the author doesn't respond. I might start a thread on Village Pump to see if we can decide on a long-lasting policy for whether RfA's like that are deleted or not. —Soap— 22:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Talkback: Template:Citation needed
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— SpikeToronto 22:33, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
AN
Hi, just a friendly note. I'm not hare to give you a bollocking. I just wanted to say that things like the RfA MfD can often be sorted by just leaving a note for the admins/editors involved. It also saves time for other editors and space on the noticeboard (which is at something of a premium) and, since you're supposed to notify the involved admins/editors anyway, it probably saves you time as well! Try to save AN and ANI for the more serious matters, rather like you'd only dial 999 (or 911 or whatever) unless you couldn;t deal with your problem any other way. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Alright thanks. The real reason why I posted at ANI was because I couldn't tell whether it fit into WT:MFD or WT:RFA, and was afraid to tell the deleting admins about it directly. I'll take up your advice for future requests, though. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 02:34, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Removed speedy deletion tag: User:Masco
Hi TeleComNasSprVen! Firstly, thanks for helping out in CSD areas. I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on User:Masco- because: No personally identifiable information, no indication that this user is a child If you have any questions or other message, please contact me. Thanks Kingpin13 (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
FWIW
Just so you know, 'deleting' per a 'keep', 'keeping' per a 'delete', 'supporting' per an 'oppose', etc. is generally considered to be a dick move. Have a nice day. Swarm X 08:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I only looked at your rationale when making a !vote. I've seen other editors do the same, and assuming too much, perhaps I used your rationale the wrong way. But to tell me to "have a nice day"? Why? :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:58, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- To chime in here and support TCNSV for once, if you don't want your !vote rationales to be interpreted in two ways, then don't write them to be so ambiguous. You'd need one of those TSA airport scanners to see any dick here. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, sorry. Some users intentionally do that; I've seen it a few times at ANI and it usually just creates frustration. For what it's worth, my !vote was intended to mean 'although you initially may want to say delete, their page is still useful. If it was unintentional, I completely apologize. Oh, and I didn't want to end it with "that was a dick move" so I just threw in a generic "have a nice day" :P. Swarm X 23:06, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Err
I'm not going to approve your request, as there appear to be no other recipients apart from yourself. Should you wish I'll email you the message itself. If I receive no correspondence the request will be deleted from the interface, please don't use MessageDeliveryBot for sending messages to yourself. Regards, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 1:24pm • 02:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
- Deleted, please refrain from making requests that have only 1 recipient or that recipient is yourself. Regards, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 2:16pm • 03:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Message added 22:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I replied. —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 9:16am • 22:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Your message
|
|---|
|
Note to self: There is currently a proposal that Soap has opened regarding your thread on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. It discusses whether or not untranscluded, unfinished RFAs with little to no votes should be deleted. The discussion can be found in the link above. Thank you. |
MessageDeliveryBot can be used for Wikipedia-related messages scheduled to be sent later, however, you indicated no time for when the message should have been sent, that's what the Notes section is for. Regards, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 10:03am • 23:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
RFD
Hi, when you nominate redirects for deletion at WP:RFD, it is important that you template them to alert editors who may be watching those redirects. Bridgeplayer (talk) 17:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! I wanted to let you know that I appreciate the work you've been doing at RfD (I agree, in principle, with most of your nominations), but I want to ask you to please keep in mind that Wikipedia's licensing affects when redirects may be deleted. Attribution of contributions must be preserved (see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia), so if a redirect previously contained content that was merged elsewhere, then that redirect generally should not be deleted. It is possible to work around this requirement by merging page histories or manually providing proper attribution, but both solutions require manual work. Cheers, and keep up the good work, -- Black Falcon (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)