Archive.org page link testing edit

p. 167

Wilford, John Noble (1969). We reach the moon; the New York times story of man's greatest adventure. New York: Bantam Books. p. 167. LCCN 74006295.

From Mot (god) edit

Phoenician sources edit

A Phoenician account survives in a paraphrase of the Greek author Philo of Byblos by Eusebius,[1] who writes of a Phoenician historian named Sanchuniathon. In this account Death is a son of Elus and counted as a god, as the text says in speaking of Elus/Cronus:

And not long after another of his sons by Rhea, named Muth, having died, he deifies him, and the Phoenicians call him Thanatos ['Death'] and Pluto.

But earlier in a philosophical creation myth Sanchuniathon has referred to great wind which merged with its parents and that connection was called 'Desire' (πόθος)[2]

From its connection Mot was produced, which some say is mud, and others a putrescence of watery compound; and out of this came every germ of creation, and the generation of the universe. So there were certain animals which had no sensation, and out of them grew intelligent animals, and were called "Zophasemin", that is "observers of heaven"; and they were formed like the shape of an egg. Also Mot burst forth into light, and sun, and moon, and stars, and the great constellations.

The form Mot (Μώτ) [3] here is not the same as Muth (Μοὺθ)[4] which appears later.


From Old Italic scripts edit

Phoenician
Letter [←]                                            
Value ʾ b g d h w z y k l m n s ʿ p q r š t
Western Greek [5] [6]
Letter [→]                                                  
Value a b g d e w zd h i k l m n o p s k r s t u ks
Transcription Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ϝ Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Σ Ϙ Ρ Σ Τ Υ Χ Φ Ψ
Etruscan - from 7th century BC [7][8]
Marsiliana [←]                                                    
Archaic (to 5th c.) [←]                                              
Neo (4th to 1st c.)[←]                                        
Value a k e v ts h th i k l m n p sh k r s t u ph kh f
Transcription a c e v z h θ i k l m n p ś q r s t u φ χ f
Oscan - from 5th century BC [9]
Letter [←]                                          
Value a b g d ɛ v ts x? i k l m n p r s t o: f o e
Transcription A B G D E V Z H I K L M N P R S T U F Ú Í
Umbrian - from 7th century BC
Letter [←]                                    
Value a b g d ɛ v ts x? i k l m n p r s t o: f
Transcription A B G D E V Z H I K L M N P R S T U F

Etruscan alphabet edit

Various Indo-European languages belonging to the Italic branch (Faliscan and members of the Sabellian group, including Oscan, Umbrian, and South Picene, and other Indo-European branches such as Celtic, Venetic and Messapic) originally used the alphabet. Faliscan, Oscan, Umbrian, North Picene, and South Picene all derive from an Etruscan form of the alphabet.[citation needed]



From Etruscan alphabet edit

Letters edit

Phoenician model                                            
Western Greek                                                  
Sound in Ancient Greek a b g d e w zd h i k l m n ks o p s k r s t u ks
Unicode Old Italic block 𐌀 𐌁 𐌂 𐌃 𐌄 𐌅 𐌆 𐌇 𐌈 𐌉 𐌊 𐌋 𐌌 𐌍 𐌎 𐌏 𐌐 𐌑 𐌒 𐌓 𐌔 𐌕 𐌖 𐌗 𐌘 𐌙 𐌚
Marsiliana tablet                                                    
Archaic Etruscan                                              
Neo-Etruscan                                        
Transcription a c e v z h θ i k l m n p ś q r s t u φ χ f
Approx. pron. a k e v ts h th i k l m n p sh k r s t u ph kh f

The shapes of the Archaic Etruscan and Neo-Etruscan letters had a few variants, used in different places and/or in different epochs. Shown above are the glyphs from the Unicode Old Italic block, whose appearance will depend on the font used by the browser. These are oriented as they would be in lines written from left to right. Also shown are SVG images of variants shown as they would be written right to left, as in most of the actual inscriptions.[10][11]


References edit

  1. ^ Eusebius of Caesarea 1903a, Book 1, chap. 9–10.
  2. ^ Eusebius of Caesarea 1903b, p. 33 c 4, Book 1, chap. 10 (Α. ιʹ).
  3. ^ Eusebius of Caesarea 1903b, p. 33 c 6, Book 1, chap. 10 (Α. ιʹ).
  4. ^ Eusebius of Caesarea 1903b, p. 38 d 7, Book 1, chap. 10 (Α. ιʹ).
  5. ^ Adolf Kirchhoff (1877). Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Alphabets. Berlin: Dümmler. p. 102. OL 24337090M.
  6. ^ Kirchhoff 1877, p. 168.
  7. ^ Giuliano Bonfante (1983). The Etruscan language. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 64. ISBN 0719009022. OCLC 610734784. OL 19629507M.
  8. ^ Herbert Alexander Stützer (1992). Die Etrusker und ihre Welt. Köln: DuMont. p. 12. ISBN 3770131282. LCCN 94191271. OCLC 611534598. OL 1198388M.
  9. ^ Carl Darling Buck (1904). A grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. Boston: Ginn. p. 22. OL 7118142M.
  10. ^ Giuliano Bonfante (1983). The Etruscan language. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 64. ISBN 0719009022. OCLC 610734784. OL 19629507M.
  11. ^ Herbert Alexander Stützer (1992). Die Etrusker und ihre Welt. Köln: DuMont. p. 12. ISBN 3770131282. LCCN 94191271. OCLC 611534598. OL 1198388M.

Bibliography edit