Please proofread the daily tip...

It's displayed below one day early.

Some tips are obsolete. So we need new tips too. Please share your best tips and tip ideas at the Tip of the day department.


edit Tomorrow's tip of the day...

Displaying one page within another = Transclusion

Including the contents of a template page on a different page (by surrounding the page name with double braces, i.e. "{{}}" and leaving out the "Template:" prefix) is called transclusion.

This allows the other page to be automatically updated whenever the template page is updated.

Besides templates, pages in the following namespaces can be transcluded:

  • Category:
  • Help:
  • Portal:
  • User:
  • Wikipedia:

The only difference between transcluding these and templates is that you must include the prefix (followed by a colon) with the page's name inside the double braces.

Images also can be transcluded, but this is done using double square brackets instead of braces.

Here are some examples of transclusion:

{{Pic of the day}} · {{Help:Contents}} · [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png]]

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd-tomorrow}}

Mostly I wish people would write more concisely and carefully, omitting needles words and avoiding weasel words and peacock terms. That probably captures most of my editing changes. Simple things reflecting some of the sentiments in Strunk's The_Elements_of_Style. Don't worry too much about what Geoffrey K. Pullum says about the horrid little book at language log - he's barking up a different tree, mostly upset that someone made a list of rules almost a 100 years ago, and that some people take them as commandments.

Policy and guideline links for my own memory edit

Things to follow up edit

References edit

My Sandbox edit

In Progress edit

Discrepancy between Minuteman entry on flight computer and importance to integrated circuits, and what I've seen from the AGC. IN particular, Minuteman originally used discretes (whereas AGC used ICs). Also, it's not clear that the minuteman programs use of ICs was "crucial" to IC development. Also, they were significant customers, but they did not drive the research and development leading to ICs. Cart in front of the horse? Maybe.

LGM-30 Minuteman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGM-30_Minuteman#Minuteman-II_.28LGM-30F.29

Apollo spacecraft - singular vs plural. What constitutes a spacecraft? In NASA's view, were they individual spacecraft (yes) or components of 1 space craft (yes).

Apollo PGNCS

Apollo Guidance Computer

Note that the claim in AGC that "The Apollo flight computer was the first to use integrated circuits (ICs)" needs to be backed up by a reference. I'm looking at some of the AGC project info for a clear one on this. I'd like solid figures on numbers of ICs used in AGC vs total sales.

Interest of the week: Apollo Guidance Computer edit

I'm trying to work out how the various Apollo pages are related. Particularly the Apollo Program and its relationship to AGC, PGNCS, LM, and CM, but also in the wider context of the various missions, hardware, and people.

Also discussion of AGC and 1201/1202 alarms in Apollo 11 is slightly inconsistent/wrong - working to put together a clearer description.

Note in History_of_computing_hardware#Second generation: transistors that there is no mention of the intermediate step - integrated circuit based computers post transistor and pre intel 4004 - e.g., the AGC and the Minuteman guidance computers.

Random Apollo Links edit

A blog with a timeline of IC development and usage in Apollo and military - no references, but no matter - can track it down

Apollo References As a note to Self edit

Reference from Apollo-11 crew to the 1201 and 1202 cautions during the LM powered descent:

  • Collins, Michael; Aldrin, Edwin (1975), Cortright, Edgar M. (ed.), "A Yellow Caution Light", "NASA SP-350, Apollo Expeditions to the Moon", Washington, DC: NASA, pp. "Chapter 11.4", ISBN 978-9997398277, retrieved 2009-08-30 {{citation}}: More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
  • "Apollo 11 mission report", MSC-00171; NASA-TM-X-62633, NASA, retrieved 2009-08-30 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |NASA_Accession_ID= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |NASA_DocumentID= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |NASA_Report Number= ignored (help)

LRV edit

NASA Technical Report Server edit

[[1]]


My new LRO Lede edit

Done - merged over into the LRO article some while ago (but pre-impact ... no doubt changed by now)

HEVs and electric motors edit

Are both notable for being poor quality. Why? Also, why so many different poor pages for types of electric motors.