Open main menu

Wikipedia β

The word electricity refers generally to the movement of electrons (or other charge carriers) through a conductor in the presence of potential and an electric field. The speed of this flow has multiple meanings. In everyday electrical and electronic devices, the signals or energy travel as electromagnetic waves typically on the order of 50%–99% of the speed of light, while the electrons themselves move (drift) much more slowly.

Contents

Electromagnetic wavesEdit

The speed at which energy or signals travel down a cable is actually the speed of the electromagnetic wave, not the movement of electrons. Electromagnetic wave propagation is fast and depends on both the permeability and the permittivity of the material. In a vacuum the wave travels at the speed of light and almost that fast in air.

Speed of electromagnetic waves in good dielectricsEdit

The speed of electromagnetic waves in a low-loss dielectric is given by

  .[1]:346

where

  = speed of light in vacuum.
  = the permeability of free space = 4π x 10−7 H/m.
  = relative magnetic permeability of the material. Usually in good dielectrics, eg. vacuum, air, Teflon,  .
  =    .
  = the permitivity of free space = 8.854 x 10−12 F/m.
  = relative permitivity of the material. Usually in good conductors eg. copper, silver, gold,  .
  =    .

Speed of electromagnetic waves in good conductorsEdit

The speed of electromagnetic waves in a good conductor is given by

 .[1]:360

where

  = frequency.
  = angular frequency = 2πf.
  = conductivity of annealed copper = 5.96 x 107 S/m.
  = conductivity of the material relative to the conductivity of copper. For hard drawn copper   may be as low as 0.97.
  =  .

In copper at 60 Hz,   3.2 m/s. Some sprinters can run twice as fast. As a consequence of Snell's Law and the extremely low speed, electromagnetic waves always enter good conductors in a direction that is normal to the surface, regardless of the angle of incidence. This velocity is the speed with which electromagnetic waves penetrate into the conductor and is not the drift velocity of the conduction electrons.

Electromagnetic waves in circuitsEdit

In the theoretical investigation of electric circuits, the velocity of propagation of the electromagnetic field through space is usually not considered; the field is assumed, as a precondition, to be present throughout space. The magnetic component of the field is considered to be in phase with the current, and the electric component is considered to be in phase with the voltage. The electric field starts at the conductor, and propagates through space at the velocity of light (which depends on the material it is traveling through). Note that the electromagnetic fields do not move through space. It is the electromagnetic energy that moves, the corresponding fields simple grow and decline in a region of space in response to the flow of energy. At any point in space, the electric field corresponds not to the condition of the electric energy flow at that moment, but to that of the flow at a moment earlier. The latency is determined by the time required for the field to propagate from the conductor to the point under consideration. In other words, the greater the distance from the conductor, the more the electric field lags.[2]

Since the velocity of propagation is very high – about 300,000 kilometers per second – the wave of an alternating or oscillating current, even of high frequency, is of considerable length. At 60 cycles per second, the wavelength is 5,000 kilometers, and even at 100,000 hertz, the wavelength is 3 kilometers. This is a very large distance compared to those typically used in field measurement and application.[2]

The important part of the electric field of a conductor extends to the return conductor, which usually is only a few feet distant. At greater distance, the aggregate field can be approximated by the differential field between conductor and return conductor, which tend to cancel. Hence, the intensity of the electric field is usually inappreciable at a distance which is still small compared to the wavelength. Within the range in which an appreciable field exists, this field is practically in phase with the flow of energy in the conductor. That is, the velocity of propagation has no appreciable effect unless the return conductor is very distant, or entirely absent, or the frequency is so high that the distance to the return conductor is an appreciable portion of the wavelength.[2]

Electric driftEdit

The drift velocity deals with the average velocity of a particle, such as an electron, due to an electric field. In general, an electron will propagate randomly in a conductor at the Fermi velocity.[3] Free electrons in a conductor follow a random path. Without the presence of an electric field, the electrons have no net velocity. When a DC voltage is applied, the electron drift velocity will increase in speed proportionally to the strength of the electric field. The drift velocity is on the order of millimeters per hour. AC voltages cause no net movement; the electrons oscillate back and forth in response to the alternating electric field (over a distance of a few micrometers – see example calculation).

See alsoEdit

Further readingEdit

  • Alfvén, H. (1950). Cosmical electrodynamics. Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • Alfvén, H. (1981). Cosmic plasma. Taylor & Francis US.
  • General Electric review, Volume 15 By General Electric. "Velocity of Propagation of Electric Field", Charles Proteus Steinmetz.
  • Fleming, J. A. (1911). Propagation of electric currents in telephone & telegraph conductors. New York: Van Nostrand

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ a b Hayt, William H. (1989), Engineering Electromagnetics (5th ed.), McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0070274061 
  2. ^ a b c Theory and calculation of transient electric phenomena and oscillations By Charles Proteus Steinmetz
  3. ^ Academic Press dictionary of science and technology By Christopher G. Morris, Academic Press.

External linksEdit

  • Propagation Times
  • Locomotive engineers journal, Volume 22 By Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (U.S.) Page 692. Describes an unsuccessful experiment from 1888.