 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Kollywood Star, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Kollywood Star! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
Nomination of Archana Paneru for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archana Paneru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archana Paneru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legacypac (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Kollywood Star,
I believe your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archana Paneru was inappropriate for a number of reasons:
- You created the article
- You were involved in the discussion
- There was no clear consensus one way or the other - a single (uninvolved) vote does *not* show a consensus.
I'd suggest you consider undoing the closure or talking to an administrator to do so.
Best,
Frood 06:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello frood! I closed the discussion because the article is notable enough to be kept in wikipedia. Even the nominator does't replies to my comments there and see someone else supported to keep the article. Also no admins were paying attention to close the discussion. If you you are an admin I request you to close it again. Regards KW Star 03:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲水 13:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 04:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).