22:16 31-03-09 [1] List of common misconceptions Physics: don't need an in-line citation for text which is summary of an article. The source is also given if you look at the image.
21:56 31-03-09 [2] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Jed Rothwell and copyvio claims: fmt
21:55 31-03-09 [3] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Undid revision 280950837 by Abd (talk)no, it does belong here.
21:54 31-03-09 [4] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 by Abd: actually, move this below
21:54 31-03-09 [5] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: format
21:49 31-03-09 [6] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: format and link blocks
21:42 31-03-09 [7] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Description: hopefully, done with this section.
21:24 31-03-09 [8] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": fix link
21:18 31-03-09 [9] List of common misconceptions Computing: oops, got the wrong date.
21:17 31-03-09 [10] Z3 (computer) How the Z3 relates to other work: simplify
21:15 31-03-09 [11] Z3 (computer) How the Z3 relates to other work: add mention of ABC
21:12 31-03-09 [12] List of common misconceptions Computing: clean up syntax, and we don't need to source simple facts for objects we have articles on. Presumably those articles have sources. If not, that's where the fix or tags should be!
20:49 31-03-09 [13] List of common misconceptions Computing: nah, don't bold that.
20:47 31-03-09 [14] Talk:List of common misconceptions Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": pressure difference across the pipe, not absolute pressure.
20:45 31-03-09 [15] Talk:List of common misconceptions Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": I learned, not physics, but how to think.
20:40 31-03-09 [16] Talk:List of common misconceptions Really bad explanation in Physics section. Absurd "misconception": how about a little OR?
19:57 31-03-09 [17] Talk:List of common misconceptions Bicycle question: fix the bicycle text to remove apparent contradiction.
19:52 31-03-09 [18] List of common misconceptions Physics: fix per talk.
19:49 31-03-09 [19] Talk:List of common misconceptions Great example of a misconception. Mine.: something really great could come out of this.
17:29 31-03-09 [20] Muon-catalyzed fusion lousy name, neologism, unsourced, cn tag for courtesy. Very hot fusion but barely hot enough for blunt fusion is still called "cold fusion."
17:27 31-03-09 [21] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": cool fusion a lousy name.
17:25 31-03-09 [22] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": sp
17:24 31-03-09 [23] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": work smarter, not harder.
14:55 31-03-09 [24] Talk:Cold fusion Coverage of Mosier-Boss paper by Wissenschaft-online: get a translation!
14:53 31-03-09 [25] Talk:Cold fusion Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: Agree in part.
02:59 31-03-09 [26] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: add first efforts to resolve dispute
01:57 31-03-09 [27] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Conflict with Jed Rothwell: add link to recent edit of Cold fusion.
01:51 31-03-09 [28] User:Radhakrishnansk Reverted 1 edit by 117.204.80.23 identified as vandalism to last revision by Radhakrishnansk. (TW)
01:26 31-03-09 [29] Talk:Cold fusion Distinction Between "Cold Fusion" and "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR)": well, that's right, actually.
01:08 31-03-09 [30] Talk:Cold fusion The report results suggest ...: Just in, man bites dog, Park considers LENR to be "science."
00:35 31-03-09 [31] Talk:Cold fusion The report results suggest ...: The context is crucial here. The neutrons do NOT explain cold fusion, but cold fusion might be necessary to explain why hot fusion is happening in there.
23:42 30-03-09 [32] Talk:Cold fusion The report results suggest ...: explain "sentence" reference.
23:39 30-03-09 [33] Talk:Cold fusion The report results suggest ...: I thought I took this out before. Weird database behavior last few minutes.
23:37 30-03-09 [34] Talk:Cold fusion but don't explain what process was causing them.: expecting a particle physicist to have a fast and appropriate off-the-cuff comment about this is quite unrealistic. CR-39 is for low-budget phys.
19:32 30-03-09 [35] Talk:Cold fusion Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: SPAWAR work itself a confirmation of earlier work, and earlier SPAWAR work has been confirmed. The neutron finding is solid on the face.
19:18 30-03-09 [36] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: RS is RS, but different forms of RS exist for different types of text. With attribution, primary sources can be RS, for example.
18:46 30-03-09 [37] Talk:Cold fusion CR-39 and positive and negative results.: format
18:44 30-03-09 [38] Talk:Cold fusion CR-39 and positive and negative results.: new section
15:06 30-03-09 [39] Talk:University of Atlanta My Hunch: "Rule-bound Robot!" that would be uncivil, for sure.
15:03 30-03-09 [40] Talk:University of Atlanta My Hunch: not about you, A.B.
15:01 30-03-09 [41] Talk:University of Atlanta New material: The Iverson stuff is dicey.
14:56 30-03-09 [42] Talk:University of Atlanta New material: thanks, A.B. good.
14:45 30-03-09 [43] University of Atlanta New operation as University of Atlanta: fmt
14:44 30-03-09 [44] University of Atlanta History: Ah! there it is. Need to know details of organizational shift. Did Barrington change its name or were Barrington assets sold to new corporation?
14:42 30-03-09 [45] University of Atlanta History: set off. We need source on the change of ownership, UofA has new owners, not impeached by the former troubles.
14:38 30-03-09 [46] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: fmt
14:36 30-03-09 [47] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: a bit more
14:33 30-03-09 [48] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: about sources and considerations and the lack of conflict in sources (i.e., true conflict is rare)
13:56 30-03-09 [49] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 note that this is a draft
06:58 30-03-09 [50] Talk:Cold fusion Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: against better judgment, perhaps, but I wrote the damn thing and it's quicker to save it.
06:37 30-03-09 [51] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: bold claims for someone with no quality source to back them up.
06:22 30-03-09 [52] Talk:Cold fusion Lack of accepted explanation using conventional physics: er, your POV is showing. I'll avert my eyes while you fix it.
06:11 30-03-09 [53] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Description: fmt
06:10 30-03-09 [54] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Description: remove unused reference
06:05 30-03-09 [55] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Applicable policies: fmt
06:03 30-03-09 [56] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute: outline evidence of trying and failing.
05:53 30-03-09 [57] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Description: conflict with Jed Rothwell.
05:12 30-03-09 [58] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Applicable policies: no specific deletion policy found
05:09 30-03-09 [59] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: fix links
05:07 30-03-09 [60] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: add protected pages edited, etc.
04:24 30-03-09 [61] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Description: finish section showing deep involvement
03:37 30-03-09 [62] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: time will tell, eh? Meanwhile, we will rely on reliable source and not unverified opinions about what Mr. or Ms. Mainstream has to say.
03:12 30-03-09 [63] Talk:Cold fusion Headline: US Navy laboratory unveiled evidence of cold fusion: pull down that ugly link. Yes, article text wasn't necessary anyway.
03:08 30-03-09 [64] Talk:University of Atlanta New material: comparison with University of Phoenix
03:02 30-03-09 [65] Talk:University of Atlanta New material: I share your concern, A.B.
02:55 30-03-09 [66] Talk:University of Atlanta New material: I do have a problem with balance now. Way too much on old scandal. Not sure how to deal with it, except not to wax too eloquent on it.
02:36 30-03-09 [67] Talk:University of Atlanta Someone getting to excited over this.: some newspaper stuff doesn't become Googleable.
02:34 30-03-09 [68] Talk:University of Atlanta My Hunch: movingtoanapartment.com? honestly ... never mind.
02:21 30-03-09 [69] Talk:University of Atlanta My Hunch: I have hunches as well. Mistro12, welcome, but please be careful.
01:36 30-03-09 [70] Talk:List of common misconceptions Great example of a misconception. Mine.: new section
01:21 30-03-09 [71] Talk:List of common misconceptions Really bad explanation in Physics section. Don't know anyone who thinks the flow rate is the same no matter how big the opening! It's actually absurd.: Who wrote this ugly section head?
01:20 30-03-09 [72] Talk:List of common misconceptions Really bad explanation in Physics section. Don't know anyone who thinks the flow rate is the same no matter how big the opening! It's actually absurd.
01:15 30-03-09 [73] Talk:List of common misconceptions Really bad explanation in Physics section. Don't know anyone who thinks the flow rate is the same no matter how big the opening! It's actually absurd.: new section
00:53 30-03-09 [74] Talk:List of common misconceptions Islam: great section of the article.
00:21 30-03-09 [75] Talk:List of common misconceptions Request for comment on sourcing this list: okay, you rang? about standards.
21:36 29-03-09 [76] Talk:Cold fusion Navy research cold fusion reports: Late to the party, but welcome anyway. The booze is all gone (not me!) but there are some fascinating dancers.
21:21 29-03-09 [77] Talk:Cold fusion The report results suggest ...: Science Daily: "neutrons, subatomic particles that scientists view as tell-tale signs that nuclear reactions are occurring." plus blogger critique
20:42 29-03-09 [78] User talk:Abd User:Abd/JzG: ah, politics. Don't leave home without it. Big surprise, headline: "Wikipedia Community Found to Be Affected by Politics! Editors Discovered to be Human!"
20:24 29-03-09 [79] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: Krivit isn't "criticizing" the idea that low-energy nuclear reactions are involved.
18:59 29-03-09 [80] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Statement of the dispute: tweak desired outcome.
18:46 29-03-09 [81] Cold fusion fix link to section of article that has been renamed.
18:41 29-03-09 [82] Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: try to find consensus in the smallest possible group first, then expand if needed.
18:27 29-03-09 [83] Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: experts are particularly vulnerable to indef block.
18:11 29-03-09 [84] Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: sure, vandal-only accounts. But "indef blocked" doesn't equal "vandal."
18:05 29-03-09 [85] Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion Stop the wholesale Deletion of the Usepages of Indefinitely Blocked Users: please do stop it, I've seen some bad examples.
15:23 29-03-09 [86] User talk:Abd User:Abd/JzG: sp etc.
15:20 29-03-09 [87] User talk:Abd User:Abd/JzG: RfC drafted at User:Abd/JzG/RfC
14:34 29-03-09 [88] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: add edit summaries
13:49 29-03-09 [89] Cold fusion Incompatibilities with conventional physics: actually, there are explanations, including ones that allegedly use conventional theory. So this is more neutral.
06:44 29-03-09 [90] User talk:Abd 30 days for rfc have passed
06:41 29-03-09 [91] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Applicable policies: add policy references
06:30 29-03-09 [92] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Powers misused: add known blocks
06:14 29-03-09 [93] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 remove notes
06:13 29-03-09 [94] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 template the regular
06:12 29-03-09 [95] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 Statement of the dispute: start it.
03:39 29-03-09 [96] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 subst
23:50 28-03-09 [97] User talk:Abd using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: this is an encyclopedia, not an article in a tabloid.
17:45 28-03-09 [98] Template:RfC3 Powers misused: format
17:45 28-03-09 [99] Template:RfC3 Powers misused: add additional privilege not listed with template RfC but requiring admin bit.
17:43 28-03-09 [100] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JzG 3 start page with template
16:59 28-03-09 [101] Cold fusion 2009 reports: replace badly redundant sentence with a simple one saying the same thing.
16:57 28-03-09 [102] Cold fusion 2009 reports: correct captions. The single pits are from prior experiments, not the neutron work. Unless I missed something.
16:49 28-03-09 [103] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: re wikilinking CR-39
16:34 28-03-09 [104] Talk:Cold fusion cold fusion cell: media source vs. peer-reviewed reliable source?
13:50 28-03-09 [105] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: yes, see Krivit's comments. They *assume* that the authors provided an explanation he considered premature.
13:42 28-03-09 [106] User talk:Abd using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: *of course* the articles use "cold fusion," this is journalists interpreting the results in terms of a popular concept.
13:17 28-03-09 [107] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot stain Keep or Merge
12:56 28-03-09 [108] Hot stain #NAME?
12:53 28-03-09 [109] User talk:Skipsievert Hot stain: one or two really doesn't make much difference in the long run.
03:40 28-03-09 [110] Cold fusion 2009 reports: wikify CR-39, replace redundant text re neutrons, remove Krivit remark as not needed here (LENR covers it),
03:24 28-03-09 [111] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: detailed discussion of some problems with the section
21:33 27-03-09 [112] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion discussion: agree it's possible, though maybe a long shot.
21:23 27-03-09 [113] Talk:Cold fusion About those missing gamma rays, a question.: we definitely need to work on the theory sections.
16:25 27-03-09 [114] Talk:Cold fusion Coverage of Mosier-Boss paper by Wissenschaft-online: new section
15:59 27-03-09 [115] Talk:List of common misconceptions Guidelines for this article.: new section
15:42 27-03-09 [116] Talk:Cold fusion POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: rm unneeded outdent
15:41 27-03-09 [117] Talk:Cold fusion POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: agree with Coppertwig and V
15:16 27-03-09 [118] Talk:Cold fusion Variations on "pathological science": at some point the boulder and gravity win. Unless we can have fun pushing it up the hill.
15:10 27-03-09 [119] Talk:Cold fusion Anachronism: better title, I hope.
15:07 27-03-09 [120] Talk:Cold fusion Anachronism: we can count publications in Talk, and we can create list articles.
14:49 27-03-09 [121] Cold fusion Further developments: The heat is the fundamental scientific question and, in fact, the fundamental funding question, which was the charge of the panel.
14:47 27-03-09 [122] Cold fusion Further developments: MIndreading, still, but attributed to mind-reader, which is much better. In the end, though, claims without examples won't cut it. Not being verified is BS.
14:42 27-03-09 [123] Cold fusion Further developments: That wired article gives very little attention to the topic and yet is somehow able to mind-read motivations. A better source would be fine, one aware of the extensive work.
14:38 27-03-09 [124] Cold fusion Proposed explanations: This section is still radically imbalanced toward skepticism. There are many proposed explanations, and only the vaguest is mentioned here, "Condensed matter."
11:22 27-03-09 [125] Talk:Cold fusion one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper: can't win for losing
04:24 27-03-09 [126] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Suspected_User:Fredrick_day_sock
04:22 27-03-09 [127] User talk:Abd Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Suspected_User:Fredrick_day_sock: I'd conclude it was likely FD in spite of the checkuser report.
04:03 27-03-09 [128] User talk:Abd Naturwissenschaften: try to keep what you can from another editor's edits.
04:01 27-03-09 [129] User talk:Abd using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: why not call a spade a spade, instead of "tool."
03:37 27-03-09 [130] Talk:Cold fusion About those missing gamma rays, a question.: new section
03:27 27-03-09 [131] Cold fusion 3.- Conversion of ?-rays to heat: simplify and fix.
03:24 27-03-09 [132] Cold fusion Excess heat observations: sp
03:23 27-03-09 [133] Cold fusion 2009 reports: and it just is not notable that the authors of a paper describe it as very significant. Get a neutral and notable comment, please.
03:22 27-03-09 [134] Cold fusion 2009 reports: trying to fix the link, ran into edit conflict with the bot. but at least there is this capitalization error.
03:09 27-03-09 [135] Cold fusion 2009 reports: let's be a little specific, guys, and please don't call this a "criticism." He's supporting their work. NS seems to have misunderstood his comments.
03:07 27-03-09 [136] Cold fusion 2009 reports: The criticism is attributed, but, bottom line, this is traced to one quick response from a physicist who looks like he didn't read the paper.
03:05 27-03-09 [137] Cold fusion 2009 reports: remove remark about CR-39 being taken seriously as not supported by source. Please be careful about synthesis.
03:00 27-03-09 [138] Cold fusion 2009 reports: It's not a life-sciences journal. It's reliable source because it's peer-reviewed, but we don't preface sources with "reliable source," either.
02:55 27-03-09 [139] Talk:Cold fusion Additions to "further developments": about the sequence of edits here and the "oh good god" response.
00:31 27-03-09 [140] User talk:Abd Naturwissenschaften: look, they are *explicitly* a "multidisciplinary science journal covering all aspects of the natural sciences"
23:41 26-03-09 [141] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion discussion: restore my edit unchopped up.
23:31 26-03-09 [142] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion discussion: if someone thinks collapse is better, they are free to try it. I'm not going to get exercised about it. It's not against the MOS, as far as I could find.
23:15 26-03-09 [143] User talk:Abd using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: format
23:14 26-03-09 [144] User talk:Abd 30 days for rfc have passed: thanks, Enric
23:09 26-03-09 [145] User talk:Abd Thanks: no problem, and congratulations on the swift recovery.
20:06 26-03-09 [146] User talk:Abd using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article: we have stuffed many topics into one article, that's one reason why consensus has been difficult.
18:47 26-03-09 [147] User talk:Abd using "cold fusion" in the cold fusion article
18:26 26-03-09 [148] Talk:University of Atlanta Blacklisted website: general comment on whitelisting
17:02 26-03-09 [149] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion discussion: maybe.
15:39 26-03-09 [150] Talk:Binyam Mohamed US pressure detainees to hide torture at Guantanamo: not news
15:38 26-03-09 [151] Talk:University of Atlanta Hatnotes: careful.
15:32 26-03-09 [152] Talk:University of Atlanta Blacklisted website: why it was relisted, and why the link should stay active.
15:14 26-03-09 [153] University of Atlanta Undid revision 279807249 by A. B. (talk)I agree that we don't need "defunct."
15:05 26-03-09 [154] Talk:Cold fusion Variations on "pathological science": the blind men and the elephant. Why can't they get their reports to confirm each other?
14:55 26-03-09 [155] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion discussion: on WP:NOTAFORUM and the implications.
14:41 26-03-09 [156] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion discussion: I'm not you, Phil. If I were, I'd be redundant and unnecessary.
14:31 26-03-09 [157] Talk:Cold fusion Anachronism: I agree. Let's compile a list.
14:20 26-03-09 [158] Talk:Cold fusion Die Naturwissenschaften isn't properly described as a "Life Sciences" journal.: new section
14:02 26-03-09 [159] Cold fusion 2009 reports: Naturwissenschaften isn't a "life sciences journal." Simplify, wikify notable topics, add significant detail.
13:22 26-03-09 [160] Cold fusion 2009 reports: it's not a criticism of the findings. Been saying for some time, the field is LENR, not "cold fusion." NET is notable, needs article.
01:47 26-03-09 [161] Talk:TurnKey Linux RfC: How can this proposed article be improved?: sources need not be in English.
01:37 26-03-09 [162] Talk:Binyam Mohamed US pressure detainees to hide torture at Guantanamo: just a couple of sources.
01:24 26-03-09 [163] Talk:Binyam Mohamed US pressure detainees to hide torture at Guantanamo: not based just on that source, which is adequate to confirm notability, but doesn't seem reliable, because of polemic.
01:13 26-03-09 [164] Talk:Cold fusion Variations on "pathological science": it is mentioned in the body of the article.
00:54 26-03-09 [165] Talk:Cold fusion Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: the proof is in the pudding.
00:47 26-03-09 [166] Talk:Cold fusion Variations on "pathological science": interesting. Yes, CF isn't at all like this.
00:18 26-03-09 [167] Talk:Cold fusion Variations on "pathological science": a little late to the party, II, but welcome.
00:08 26-03-09 [168] Talk:Cold fusion Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: a certain level of OR and SYNTH is not only permitted on Talk, it may be a very good thing. The guidelines regulate article content.
17:38 25-03-09 [169] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Should readers be given a link to the paper where they can read it?: no opinion expressed to the contrary
17:34 25-03-09 [170] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Links to lenr-canr.org were allegedly linkspammed: I shoulda signed this
17:33 25-03-09 [171] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Lenr-canr.org allegedly alters documents: link acceptable with "unverified tag" until verified or found to be altered.
17:27 25-03-09 [172] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Lenr-canr.org allegedly is a fringe web site or biased: collapse discussion, state proposed consensus believed clear. Revert if not and discuss.
17:10 25-03-09 [173] Talk:Cold fusion Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: reply to V.
16:32 25-03-09 [174] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: Thanks, Fred, good luck.
15:33 25-03-09 [175] User talk:Sarcasticidealist You will be missed.: new section
14:27 25-03-09 [176] Cold fusion Further developments: how can a 2005 source cover response to conferences held in 2006 and 2007?
14:24 25-03-09 [177] Cold fusion 2009 reports: remove peacock, significance is obvious; remove "lack of mainstream acceptance," not found in source, synthesis.
14:15 25-03-09 [178] Talk:Cold fusion Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: where we are going.
02:49 25-03-09 [179] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: more on the New Scientist piece.
02:47 25-03-09 [180] Talk:Cold fusion Mosier-Boss SPAWAR paper on neutrons.: new section
01:35 25-03-09 [181] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: the Guardian writer explained what he was about.
21:47 24-03-09 [182] User talk:Abd UofA section #1356234 ..: Thanks, Beetstra.
21:37 24-03-09 [183] User talk:Abd File copyright problem with File:Triple tracks in CR-39.jpg: Well, I did what I could. I'd hope, in fact, for more assistance and less "warning," but I'm sure you are busy.
20:25 24-03-09 [184] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: consensus process.
19:44 24-03-09 [185] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: rm extra, punct
19:41 24-03-09 [186] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: we use "reliable media sources" with caution, for good reason, when it comes to science. There are actually all kinds of problems with them.
19:08 24-03-09 [187] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: sign it
19:05 24-03-09 [188] Cold fusion Undid revision 279415298 by Neurolysis (talk)hopefully, I've taken care of it.
19:02 24-03-09 [189] 
image was released without restrictions.) (top) [rollback]
18:36 24-03-09 [190] Cold fusion Further developments: move image up, looks better
18:34 24-03-09 [191] Cold fusion Further developments: add image of "triple tracks from SPAWAR group.
18:24 24-03-09 [192] User talk:Aappe General note: Vandalism on Template:Commonspar. (TW)) (top
18:23 24-03-09 [193] Template:Commonspar Reverted edits by Aappe (talk) to last version by Netoholic) (top) [rollback]
18:09 24-03-09 [194] From American Chemical Society press release, [195] Caption: An experimental "cold fusion" device produced this pattern of "triple tracks" (shown at right), which scientists say is caused by high
18:00 24-03-09 [196] Cold fusion Further developments: well, this *is* a development.... This was widely reported in reliable source, but this info is from the ACS press release.
17:16 24-03-09 [197] Cold fusion See also: external link to videos from press conference at ACS meeting yesterday.
14:43 24-03-09 [198] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: sign it
14:42 24-03-09 [199] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice: about the Wired report. *very* old news, nothing about yesterday's announcement or recent work.
14:34 24-03-09 [200] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: no consensus for current version, but it may be adequate for now, as long as it's not rigid. It has no special status, given the history.
14:20 24-03-09 [201] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: on the news.
04:20 24-03-09 [202] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: not live
04:07 24-03-09 [203] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: live video or audio?
03:57 24-03-09 [204] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: the stories are being largely taken from an alleged ACS press release. Is it? Probably. But that should be confirmed.
03:53 24-03-09 [205] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: Techradar news. group of researchers reporting "compelling new evidence"
03:34 24-03-09 [206] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: EE Times "Cold fusion experimentally confirmed."
03:23 24-03-09 [207] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: sign it.
03:22 24-03-09 [208] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: my, my, my. How can I assist?
02:40 24-03-09 [209] User talk:Pcarbonn Congratulations, seriously!: it would be nice to have a link!
02:39 24-03-09 [210] User talk:Pcarbonn AfD nomination of Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: article was userfied.
02:33 24-03-09 [211] User talk:Pcarbonn Violating the ArbCom ruling: preposterous.
23:14 23-03-09 [212] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: lost cause? My sympathies?
23:07 23-03-09 [213] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: share the wealth
23:05 23-03-09 [214] Talk:Cold fusion Media notice.: new section
22:55 23-03-09 [215] Martin Fleischmann References: replace dead link with archive copy
22:46 23-03-09 [216] Talk:Cold fusion BBC News article on ACS cold fusion session.: What unrealistic assumptions are made in the theory paper mentioned above this section?
22:32 23-03-09 [217] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: what's this about?
22:20 23-03-09 [218] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: more
22:15 23-03-09 [219] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: weird stuff.
22:14 23-03-09 [220] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: could be Fred. Weird stuff with that IP, which is indeed Fred. What connects it to the newly registered editor?
21:32 23-03-09 [221] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Suspected User:Fredrick day sock: hmmm. so we know the IP editor is probably Fred, which says nothing about the registered editor.
21:22 23-03-09 [222] Talk:Cold fusion BBC News article on ACS cold fusion session.: new section
20:02 23-03-09 [223] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: thanks for the citation, Guy.
17:05 23-03-09 [224] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: a bit more
16:53 23-03-09 [225] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: ditto
16:53 23-03-09 [226] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: fix CR-LF to space.
16:51 23-03-09 [227] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: link to guideline
16:48 23-03-09 [228] Talk:Cold fusion Cold fusion theory, possible electron-catalyzed fusion: new section
16:44 23-03-09 [229] User talk:Carcharoth Your suggestion for a working group: suggestion for how to do it.
16:18 23-03-09 [230] User talk:Abd/Open Source notability RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: how to proceed.
16:17 23-03-09 [231] Talk:University of Atlanta Semiprotection.: new section
15:37 23-03-09 [232] User talk:Abd/Open Source notability RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: sign, move LS response to after my complete response..
15:34 23-03-09 [233] User talk:Skipsievert Energy accounting: thanks for your response, Skip, it bodes well.
13:38 23-03-09 [234] User talk:Abd New Page Patrol: Thanks.
13:37 23-03-09 [235] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: format for clarity. respond. It's not "us" vs. "them," it's just "us."
02:32 23-03-09 [236] Martin Fleischmann Life and career: Half the reviewers in the 2004 DOE report considered the evidence for the F-P effect to be "compelling."
02:23 23-03-09 [237] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Link was allegedly inserted by JedRothwell, alleged POV-pusher and COI: fix link
02:20 23-03-09 [238] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: address the policy issues more specifically.
02:00 23-03-09 [239] Talk:Cold fusion Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: fmt
01:58 23-03-09 [240] Talk:Cold fusion Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: go ahead, have fun.
01:33 23-03-09 [241] Talk:Cold fusion Muon-catalysed fusion: hmmpth.
00:54 23-03-09 [242] University of Atlanta remove paren
00:45 23-03-09 [243] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: fmt
00:41 23-03-09 [244] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: On copyright policy and the value of providing convenience links.
23:57 22-03-09 [245] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Guidelines: here it is, the convenience link section.
23:48 22-03-09 [246] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Specific opinions: Don't think this subsection is needed at this point.
23:47 22-03-09 [247] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Guidelines: I think there is one more specifically about convenience links.
23:20 22-03-09 [248] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Policies: add WP:COPYVIO though it actually does not apply here because copyrighted content is not being used here.
23:03 22-03-09 [249] User talk:Abd/Open Source notability RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: welcome, John.
22:55 22-03-09 [250] User talk:Abd/Open Source notability RfC: Wikipedia guidelines for notability of open source projects: request for specifics. extended discussion in collapse box.
22:46 22-03-09 [251] User talk:Skipsievert Energy accounting: new section
22:34 22-03-09 [252] User:Abd/Rule 0 fix link) (top) [rollback]
22:33 22-03-09 [253] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: Thanks.
21:51 22-03-09 [254] Talk:TurnKey Linux RfC: How can this proposed article be improved?: refactor. Please don't break up other's comments by interspersal.
21:46 22-03-09 [255] Talk:IPhone Rfc: Should this content be included?: the RfC was a result of an RfC tag being dropped on an existing tendentious discussion. Mess. Please don't do that!
21:27 22-03-09 [256] Talk:IPhone Rfc: Should this content be included?: Close without prejudice. Here, guys, is a wikitrout. You may slap each other with it, but, please, be nice. Then cook it and share it.
20:42 22-03-09 [257] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: Yes, I knew that, suggest re-reading. Then I ramble on about how I've survived becoming a Wikiepedia editor, so far.
18:23 22-03-09 [258] Rachel Maddow restore "liberal" with source. Besides, I used to live in Cummington. "Progressive" might be a better word, though. No objection to that. I'd go for what she prefers.
18:03 22-03-09 [259] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: always provide opposing editors with a face-saving escape, if possible. Fail to do this with a raccoon, you can end up torn to shreds.
17:52 22-03-09 [260] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: always userfy before going to DRV. Political error here was userification in Liraz Siri space and by him.
17:25 22-03-09 [261] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: better here, I decided.
17:22 22-03-09 [262] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: This might be worth reading. How to tolerate the status quo and thus be able to improve it.
16:33 22-03-09 [263] User talk:Abd Accusation of incivility: sign it with original edit date
15:35 22-03-09 [264] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Prior discussion and presentations of evidence: Meta discussion
14:53 22-03-09 [265] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Prior discussion and presentations of evidence: add names of thread originators or closers.
14:48 22-03-09 [266] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Prior discussion and presentations of evidence: MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist discussion
14:01 22-03-09 [267] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Prior discussion: MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist including letter from Jed Rothwell.
13:35 22-03-09 [268] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: Thanks, Jaybdb, indeed, thank you very much. Open sections for evidence.
13:13 22-03-09 [269] Shona language remove reference to top-level web page, no reference to Shona. (probable lower page somewhere!), add cn tag
13:09 22-03-09 [270] Shona language I don't think this is controversial, though it would be better with a source. Change "official" to principal, note official language is English.
13:07 22-03-09 [271] Zimbabwe Demographics: this seems not to be controversial.
06:10 22-03-09 [272] User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley Problems with this article's return to article space: good advice, don't ignore it, I suggest
06:06 22-03-09 [273] User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley Problems with this article's return to article space: find reliable source, fine. Not, not.
05:57 22-03-09 [274] Wikipedia talk:Banning policy Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: what, specifically to refactor?
05:55 22-03-09 [275] Wikipedia talk:Banning policy Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: even though he's mentioned as an example, this isn't about SA.
05:35 22-03-09 [276] Talk:Cold fusion Muon-catalysed fusion: how muon-catalyzed fusion came to be considered a different thing than cold fusion. Political. And about practical usage for energy.
05:02 22-03-09 [277] User talk:Abd Undid revision 278884980 by Abd (talk)I'd already qualified it....
05:00 22-03-09 [278] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: actually, I've been khatib a number of other times
04:59 22-03-09 [279] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: fmt
04:58 22-03-09 [280] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: no evidence of involvement.
22:50 21-03-09 [281] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: link, format
22:47 21-03-09 [282] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: why it's not reasonable to suspect copyright violation here, and this has been consensus in a number of places.
21:46 21-03-09 [283] Talk:Cold fusion Muon-catalysed fusion: issues
21:12 21-03-09 [284] Talk:Cold fusion Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: about one of the sources.
20:50 21-03-09 [285] Talk:Cold fusion Sources comparing to polywater and/or discussing who compared it to polywater and why: where I'm going from here.
20:46 21-03-09 [286] User talk:Abd/Cold fusion open up talk page for draft) (top
20:35 21-03-09 [287] User:Abd/Cold fusion Start draft of complete coverage of topic per sources satisfying WP:V
17:45 21-03-09 [288] Cold fusion Undid revision 278475635 by 12.165.54.220 (talk)thermal energy is "excess heat"
17:38 21-03-09 [289] Talk:Association of British Drivers WP:FRINGE: using the web site of an organization as a supporting source.) (top) [rollback]
13:37 21-03-09 [290] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: please understand the context.
13:31 21-03-09 [291] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: extensive examination of the instant case, but start with general considerations
00:41 21-03-09 [292] Talk:Cold fusion add sig for Enric Naval
00:38 21-03-09 [293] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann-Pons effect: yes, there are usable sources.
00:34 21-03-09 [294] User talk:Abd Accusation of incivility: I did respond on the Talk page, you didn't mention that.
00:29 21-03-09 [295] User talk:Abd Accusation of incivility: If Shanahan has a problem, definitely, I'll address it as requested. I'm certainly not going to fill up Talk:Cold fusion with research on his behavior.
21:42 20-03-09 [296] User talk:Abd Request feedback on article: I will when I can. Maybe even tonight.
21:37 20-03-09 [297] User talk:Abd Mail: gotcha
21:35 20-03-09 [298] User talk:Abd Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Suciindia: yeah.
20:39 20-03-09 [299] User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments restore blind categories, retain userpage template
20:38 20-03-09 [300] User talk:Stepheng3 your suggestion on User talk:Abd: blank it, not necessary.
20:37 20-03-09 [301] User talk:Stepheng3 your suggestion on User talk:Abd: never mind.
20:33 20-03-09 [302] User talk:Stepheng3 your suggestion on User talk:Abd: new section
20:30 20-03-09 [303] User talk:Abd Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Suciindia: Thanks. Is there anything I need to do now?
17:17 20-03-09 [304] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann-Pons effect: minor
17:12 20-03-09 [305] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann-Pons effect: a Bad Science study.
15:56 20-03-09 [306] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: Shanahan, as an expert and professional, would be, I assume, quite pleased to find conclusive evidence for LENR.
15:33 20-03-09 [307] Talk:TurnKey Linux RfC: How can this proposed article be improved?: review the DRV.
15:22 20-03-09 [308] Talk:TurnKey Linux About the blanking of this page.: new section
15:13 20-03-09 [309] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: personal reply.
14:59 20-03-09 [310] User talk:Abd Disputed speedy deletes automatically should go to AfD: shouldn't be automatic, but only issue at DRV for a speedy should be the speedy criteria.
03:12 20-03-09 [311] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann-Pons effect: format
03:09 20-03-09 [312] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann-Pons effect: new section
22:41 19-03-09 [313] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: article published in Accountability in Research.
22:29 19-03-09 [314] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: paper on need for Q.E.D. in a condensed matter system, not apparently related to Cold fusion.
22:15 19-03-09 [315] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: further, clearer description of this by Fleischmann (2003)
18:46 19-03-09 [316] Plurality voting system Undid revision 278354380 by 58.69.28.124 (talk)sorry, this is incoherent.
18:42 19-03-09 [317] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: compare the papers. The 1989 paper gives one sentence on the background, the 2002 paper discusses it at length.
18:29 19-03-09 [318] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: looks like we are going to need some careful consideration.
18:17 19-03-09 [319] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: more of the history
17:50 19-03-09 [320] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: about my edit restoring the thinking that led up to the experiment, as reported by Fleischmann.
17:41 19-03-09 [321] Cold fusion attribute source for reminiscence; appropriate here because it provides context. What were they doing, and why, when they found the F-P effect?
17:34 19-03-09 [322] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: I'll incorporate one of Noren's concerns.
17:14 19-03-09 [323] User talk:Abd Accusation of incivility: I responded there. But, really, why this request from Noren?
17:11 19-03-09 [324] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: respond to Kirk as requested on my Talk by Noren.
16:46 19-03-09 [325] User talk:Abd Your edit-summary at [326]: sure. how?
03:00 19-03-09 [327] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: refs in bibliography with no link, hosted on lenr-canr.org
02:26 19-03-09 [328] User talk:John Nevard Transparent
02:25 19-03-09 [329] User talk:John Nevard Transparent: new section
01:14 19-03-09 [330] Martin Fleischmann Conference proceedings: edit per suggestion by Arthur Rubin, see Talk.
01:13 19-03-09 [331] Talk:Martin Fleischmann disputed reprint designation: unverified is fine, actually.
01:10 19-03-09 [332] Talk:Martin Fleischmann disputed reprint designation: jeez... louise.
00:59 19-03-09 [333] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Overall Conclusion: full comment on !vote.
00:46 19-03-09 [334] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Overall Conclusion: fix error before response
00:32 19-03-09 [335] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Overall Conclusion: "reasons given"? Where?
00:19 19-03-09 [336] Wikipedia talk:Banning policy Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: okay, a situation where the banned editor wouldn't self-revert in spite of intention to do so.
00:07 19-03-09 [337] Wikipedia talk:Banning policy Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: kumbaya
23:36 18-03-09 [338] User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley collegial collaboration that complies with the community consensus: the article will be bulletproof by the time we are done. The time may depend on the learning speed of an editor.
23:23 18-03-09 [339] User talk:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Yvonne Bradley to do: the problems with the article, where to go.
22:46 18-03-09 [340] User talk:Fritzpoll Restoration of Yvonne Bradley: here is why not right away.
22:33 18-03-09 [341] User talk:PJHaseldine Ad hominem comments: hoping for the best.
22:21 18-03-09 [342] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: thanks, Coppertwig.
22:14 18-03-09 [343] Talk:Cold fusion Example of the hysteria in 1989: wrong word
22:13 18-03-09 [344] User talk:Jayvdb/Archive 7 About your permission for fringe-science-banned editor to edit N ray: Thanks, Jayvdb.
21:57 18-03-09 [345] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: see also the discussion in Talk:Martin Fleischmann
21:46 18-03-09 [346] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Status of link in article after this discussion: it's all in history.
20:34 18-03-09 [347] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: appearance of wikilawyering? just pointing it out....
20:29 18-03-09 [348] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: this is an exception to the general guidelines about conference proceedings; notable expert writing about his own process.
20:18 18-03-09 [349] Talk:Cold fusion Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: respond to Shanahan in some detail.
19:33 18-03-09 [350] User talk:John Nevard How I use my time is my decision. How you use yours is yours.: new section
19:03 18-03-09 [351] Cold fusion Fleischmann-Pons announcement: don't make the reader stand on his or her head!
19:00 18-03-09 [352] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: relevance of the source, it's now being used as a reference, though it was always useful for background.
18:52 18-03-09 [353] Cold fusion Bibliography: get that ref right?
18:50 18-03-09 [354] Cold fusion add consideration of quantum electrodynamics. Many sources on this refer to the theoretical issue, and the reference is explicit.
18:37 18-03-09 [355] Talk:Cold fusion Fleischmann 2002 reference: why I'm reverting the reference back in pending consensus.
18:23 18-03-09 [356] User talk:THF Please explain.: action intended to protect the project is never "bad."
18:14 18-03-09 [357] User talk:Fritzpoll Restoration of Yvonne Bradley: not quite ready for prime time.
17:32 18-03-09 [358] Talk:Cold fusion Example of the hysteria in 1989: Problem is not lack of foundation, problem is that the foundation is other than the scientific method.
17:20 18-03-09 [359] User talk:John Nevard Hmmm.... conversation through edit summary. I suppose it might save some time.: new section
17:04 18-03-09 [360] Instant-runoff voting Non-governmental organizations: It was shown that the bylaws did change. My view is that the unused bylaw isn't notable, but this is a compromise.
16:46 18-03-09 [361] User talk:Abd UofA section #1356234 ..: clarify.
16:44 18-03-09 [362] User talk:Abd UofA section #1356234 ..: how a more structured, independent, whitelist process could make it easier for blacklist volunteers, and reflect broader consensus.
14:45 18-03-09 [363] User talk:Abd /AGF, but also stop those evil spammers, fangs dripping with the blood of innocent readers.
03:43 18-03-09 [364] Wikipedia talk:Banning policy Self-reverted edits by banned editors.: new section
03:25 18-03-09 [365] User talk:Abd Haseldine: I understand. However, agreeing with people when they are right is an important technique in restoring civility when it has broken down.
03:14 18-03-09 [366] User talk:THF Please explain.: I don't think the redirect was broken.
03:12 18-03-09 [367] User:Abd/Sandbox Undid revision 278024770 by Abd (talk)
03:11 18-03-09 [368] User:Abd/Sandbox test
03:09 18-03-09 [369] User:Abd/Sandbox
03:09 18-03-09 [370] User:Abd/Sandbox test
03:07 18-03-09 [371] User talk:THF Please explain.: I would have sworn that I tried it. Goes to show about swearing.
02:45 18-03-09 [372] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12 Gene Ray: lack of independent notability is really an argument for Merge, not Delete.
02:41 18-03-09 [373] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12 Gene Ray: BLP is a red herring here. BLP refers to content of articles, not to articles. Topic notable, article, Q.E.D.
02:29 18-03-09 [374] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11 Yvonne Bradley: add "closed" to section header
02:29 18-03-09 [375] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11 Randy Rasputin Richards: add "closed" to section header
02:20 18-03-09 [376] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11 Randy Rasputin Richards: close as keep deleted. stubbed draft may be reconsidered.
01:57 18-03-09 [377] Talk:Yvonne Bradley redirect Talk here to userfied page talk.
01:54 18-03-09 [378] User talk:THF Please explain.: fmt
01:53 18-03-09 [379] User talk:THF Please explain.: new section
01:46 18-03-09 [380] User talk:Fritzpoll Deletion of Talk:Yvonne Bradley
01:36 18-03-09 [381] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: note that report was archived as withdrawn by reporter. good move.
01:33 18-03-09 [382] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: maybe this will fix it.
01:31 18-03-09 [383] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard something weird going on here; in any case this archive template should go below the section title.
01:19 18-03-09 [384] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: fmt
22:53 17-03-09 [385] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: comment, negative and positive.
22:44 17-03-09 [386] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Edits by alleged Single-purpose accounts: PJH, stop it!
22:34 17-03-09 [387] User talk:PJHaseldine Ad hominem comments: by the way, technically.... but it was still uncivil without any necessity.
22:30 17-03-09 [388] User talk:PJHaseldine Ad hominem comments: please reconsider, Socrates2008.
22:17 17-03-09 [389] User talk:Fritzpoll Deletion of Talk:Yvonne Bradley: new section
22:10 17-03-09 [390] Yvonne Bradley don't know any other way to test this.... will revert if it is a problem. Show permanent link to page history as of merge.
22:01 17-03-09 [391] User talk:Fritzpoll Closure of the Yvonne Bradley DRV as endorsed without prejudice.: new section
21:56 17-03-09 [392] User talk:PJHaseldine Closure of the Yvonne Bradley DRV as endorsed without prejudice.: new section
21:50 17-03-09 [393] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 11 Yvonne Bradley: close as endorsement without prejudice. Non-admin closure.
21:37 17-03-09 [394] Binyam Mohamed Allegations of MI5 'collusion': wikify
21:35 17-03-09 [395] Binyam Mohamed Release: wikify
21:28 17-03-09 [396] User talk:PJHaseldine Ad hominem comments: take the warning seriously. On the other hand....
19:18 17-03-09 [397] User talk:Shamirhirani Your edits: agree with Beetstra.
19:11 17-03-09 [398] Talk:Cold fusion Example of the hysteria in 1989: new section
18:31 17-03-09 [399] Talk:Cold fusion Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: get the name right!
18:30 17-03-09 [400] Talk:Cold fusion Thermochimica Acta: I may have made this mistake elsewhere, too.
18:30 17-03-09 [401] Talk:Cold fusion Thermochimica Acta: restoration done.
18:27 17-03-09 [402] Cold fusion Bibliography: restore references removed without discussion
18:17 17-03-09 [403] Cold fusion Evidence for nuclear transmutations: restore ref removed without discussion
18:16 17-03-09 [404] Cold fusion Reports of nuclear products in association with excess heat: restore ref remove in January without discussion
18:13 17-03-09 [405] Cold fusion Excess heat observations: fix refs mangled in January
18:06 17-03-09 [406] Cold fusion Experimental Details: restore ref removed without discussion in January
18:02 17-03-09 [407] Talk:Cold fusion Thermochimica Acta: No, this isn't about Thermochemica Acta, it's about one editor.
17:55 17-03-09 [408] Talk:Cold fusion Review of sources: a little more on Grimshaw.
17:50 17-03-09 [409] Pan Am Flight 103 Undid revision 277842060 by PJHaseldine (talk)edit verified
17:41 17-03-09 [410] Cold Fusion (disambiguation) many other books have "Cold fusion" in the title, why this one?
17:39 17-03-09 [411] Cold Fusion (disambiguation) move Muon-catalyzed fusion up with other physics usages.
17:35 17-03-09 [412] Talk:Cold fusion More papers mentioning cold fusion.: collapse section with report of action taken.
17:16 17-03-09 [413] User talk:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments about this page.) (top
17:07 17-03-09 [414] User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments remove reference to DOE report, which is not relevant here, though specific reference to calorimetry issues in that report would be.
17:06 17-03-09 [415] User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments qualify, calorimetry isn't imporant in all cold fusion experiments.
17:03 17-03-09 [416] Talk:Cold fusion Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: Yes, being considered a pariah field has damaged it.
16:48 17-03-09 [417] Talk:Cold fusion Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: Sure. Let's do it, but we need reliable source.
16:26 17-03-09 [418] Talk:Cold fusion Re: Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: the section definitely can use work.
15:33 17-03-09 [419] Talk:Cold fusion On "calibration constant shift": Not interested in "debate." Discussion here is properly aiming for consensus, not for one side or another to win.
15:28 17-03-09 [420] Talk:Cold fusion On "calibration constant shift": Shanahan's work could be perfectly correct, but only addresses a narrow possibility.
14:57 17-03-09 [421] Talk:Cold fusion On "calibration constant shift": too much detail for this article, to be sure. However, let's work on the Calorimetry article.
14:25 17-03-09 [422] User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments This is better. I missed those categories, it's correct that this page should not show up in them.
14:22 17-03-09 [423] Talk:Cold fusion Review of sources: a review of Grimshaw shows the problem, inertia based on limited personal experience.
14:00 17-03-09 [424] Talk:Cold fusion Review of sources: new section
13:44 17-03-09 [425] Cold Fusion (disambiguation) add additional usage found in peer-reviewed papers on nucleosynthesis.
00:59 17-03-09 [426] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: yes, this is the place, and this is why.
00:24 17-03-09 [427] Talk:Cold fusion Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: sp
00:22 17-03-09 [428] Talk:Cold fusion Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: detail on the experiment from New Energy Times. Worth looking at.
22:36 16-03-09 [429] Talk:Cold fusion On "calibration constant shift": Thanks, Verbal. Come to think of it, User:Abd/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments.
22:15 16-03-09 [430] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: how to win friends and influence people. Assume they are right, but accomplish your purpose without confrontation.
20:44 16-03-09 [431] User talk:Abd Cold fusion talk: Thanks, Verbal, welcome to my Talk.
20:41 16-03-09 [432] Talk:Cold fusion Clarity of article, etc.: point to response and statement of intention
20:34 16-03-09 [433] Talk:Cold fusion On "calibration constant shift": let's start this over. Will Dr. Shanahan please explain his work, and will others help him do this?
20:24 16-03-09 [434] Talk:Cold fusion On "calibration constant shift": collapse argument not adequately focused on discovering explanation of Shanahan's work
20:21 16-03-09 [435] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 277714605 by Abd (talk)rv self to accomodate Verbal's opinion
20:20 16-03-09 [436] Talk:Cold fusion add comment about intentions, will revert immediately.
20:02 16-03-09 [437] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: why OTRS?
19:55 16-03-09 [438] Talk:Cold fusion On "constant calibration shift": change section title per Shanahan comment.
19:52 16-03-09 [439] Talk:Cold fusion Editors are reminded of civility rules and the purpose of thispage.: new section
19:35 16-03-09 [440] Talk:Cold fusion On "constant calibration shift": an edit conflict stopped this from going through earlier.
18:08 16-03-09 [441] Talk:Cold fusion Major lead problems: refactor this discussion to its own section, it is not about the lead. V, can you pipe down a bit with the rhetoric?
18:06 16-03-09 [442] Talk:Cold fusion Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: What did you read, Kirk? Translation?
14:17 16-03-09 [443] Pathological science qualify that CF is alleged to be pathological science, but that this remains controversial, there is ongoing research reported in RS.
14:14 16-03-09 [444] N ray See also: Polywater is not related to N-rays, but both are discussed under Pathological science
14:04 16-03-09 [445] User talk:John Nevard Thanks for responding: new section
13:57 16-03-09 [446] Talk:Distance Education and Training Council Article Needs Less Opinion, More Citation: Lambert analysis seems fairly accurate to me.
13:33 16-03-09 [447] Talk:Cold fusion Major lead problems: CF is a hypothesis to explain an experimental result, the Fleischmann effect.
13:12 16-03-09 [448] Talk:Cold fusion Yoshiaka Anata's experiment: about this.
02:36 16-03-09 [449] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: wikify Tsinghua University instead of whole publisher name.
02:35 16-03-09 [450] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: hey, notify the copyright holder! What a great idea!
02:24 16-03-09 [451] Martin Fleischmann remove missing reference pending fix.
02:22 16-03-09 [452] Martin Fleischmann Conference proceedings: uncomment link to convenience copy of paper.
02:20 16-03-09 [453] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Overall Conclusion: propose overall conclusion in spite of incomplete preliminary discussion.
02:10 16-03-09 [454] Cold fusion Bibliography: add convenience link to Fleischmann paper published by Tsinghua University Press in China.
02:09 16-03-09 [455] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: here is why not agree. How long will it take to get a copy of the book published in China?
01:46 16-03-09 [456] User talk:59.91.253.110 I don't think this belongs here) (top) [rollback]
01:43 16-03-09 [457] User:59.91.253.112 create with ssp tag for Kuntan) (top
01:42 16-03-09 [458] User talk:59.91.253.112 move ssp tag to user page) (top) [rollback]
01:41 16-03-09 [459] User talk:59.91.253.113 sock tag on user page) (top) [rollback]
01:39 16-03-09 [460] User talk:59.91.253.27 ssp tag on user page) (top) [rollback]
01:16 16-03-09 [461] User talk:59.91.253.110 ssp tag is on user page.
01:12 16-03-09 [462] User talk:59.91.254.63 remove SSP tage, it's on the user page) (top) [rollback]
01:11 16-03-09 [463] User talk:59.91.254.3 remove SSP tag -- it's on the user page.) (top) [rollback]
01:01 16-03-09 [464] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: discuss those pages, etc.
00:53 16-03-09 [465] hopefully, this isn't too much of a mess!
00:50 16-03-09 [466] correct link
00:47 16-03-09 [467] get that user link in there!
00:46 16-03-09 [468] checkuser link.
00:45 16-03-09 [469] uh, wikifiy that!
00:44 16-03-09 [470] get rid of redlink.
00:39 16-03-09 [471] User:192.87.16.244 tag as SSP of Suciindia) (top) [rollback]
00:38 16-03-09 [472] User:192.87.16.130 add ssp tag) (top) [rollback]
00:35 16-03-09 [473] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: what was the connection with User:Kuntan?
00:32 16-03-09 [474] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: fmt
00:32 16-03-09 [475] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: copy reply from my Talk.
00:30 16-03-09 [476] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: please respond in place. thanks.
00:26 16-03-09 [477] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: continue
00:24 16-03-09 [478] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: stop now!
00:23 16-03-09 [479] User talk:Abd Edits by Kuntan
00:20 16-03-09 [480] fmt
00:20 16-03-09 [481] create ssp category page
00:18 16-03-09 [482] create ssp category page
00:07 16-03-09 [483] User:Sekhar Lukose Kuriakose may have been placed by banned user, but is accurate. Not that it matters a lot!) (top) [rollback]
23:59 15-03-09 [484] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Blanking of User talk:192.87.16.244: what attracted you to this page?
23:53 15-03-09 [485] User talk:192.87.16.130 remove drive-by ssp allegation by SPA.) (top) [rollback]
23:47 15-03-09 [486] User:Sekhar Lukose Kuriakose Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G5). (TW)
23:44 15-03-09 [487] User talk:192.87.16.244 User page created by suspected sock of User:Kuntan: remove section, ITC is a school. IP behaves as if fixed for a specific user.) (top) [rollback]
23:43 15-03-09 [488] User:192.87.16.244 It's a school, remove speedy template
23:39 15-03-09 [489] User talk:192.87.16.244 User page created by suspected sock of User:Kuntan: new section
23:39 15-03-09 [490] User talk:Radhakrishnansk WP:SPI: be careful, R.
23:26 15-03-09 [491] User:192.87.16.244 Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G5). (TW)
23:10 15-03-09 [492] User talk:192.87.16.244 remove sock template added by SPA
22:46 15-03-09 [493] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist m-monroe.org: win some, lose some
22:40 15-03-09 [494] User talk:Abd SUCI Page regarding: well, watch out for "uncivilised." That's a uncivil comment. He's banned, that should be the end of the topic....
22:09 15-03-09 [495] User talk:Orangemarlin March 2009: mood-altering drugs. If OM can't manage his reactions, maybe he *should* take them.
22:05 15-03-09 [496] User talk:Orangemarlin March 2009: Civility does, in fact, "trump" NPOV, but only because civility is a precondition for the assessment of NPOV.
21:50 15-03-09 [497] User talk:Radhakrishnansk WP:SPI: SPI a waste of time.
21:45 15-03-09 [498] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12 Gene Ray: editor probably never saw Stifle's question.
21:42 15-03-09 [499] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12 Gene Ray: Overturn.
21:33 15-03-09 [500] Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 March 12 Gene Ray: Stifle comment clearly based on irrelevant issue, !vote should be disregarded.
21:18 15-03-09 [501] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gevork Nazaryan Gevork Nazaryan: Delete, inadequate notability asserted.
21:08 15-03-09 [502] User talk:Phil153 Gevork Nazaryan: add editor's user links an edit time.
21:02 15-03-09 [503] User talk:Phil153 Gevork Nazaryan: assist editor by creating section
20:59 15-03-09 [504] User talk:Phil153 Thanks!: I saw your efforts on User talk:Orangemarlin, good work.
20:33 15-03-09 [505] User talk:BellahBluesky AfD nomination of Krier (LRDF): about editing the article with your plea for the article to be kept, and ... good luck with your writing.) (top) [rollback]
20:30 15-03-09 [506] User talk:BellahBluesky notice re AfD for Krier (LRDF)
20:22 15-03-09 [507] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krier (LRDF) Delete. Will properly notify author.
19:51 15-03-09 [508] User talk:John Nevard Have a nice day, and keep it that way.: new section
19:31 15-03-09 [509] User talk:EdJohnston Proposed wording for proposed restrictions on PJHaseldine: all bans are temporary, so duration is mostly moot. It may actually be easier to reverse an unspecified ban than a specific one.
19:16 15-03-09 [510] User talk:Abd SUCI Page regarding: continue advice on how to deal with banned editor, and message for Kuntan.
19:13 15-03-09 [511] User talk:Abd/IP sign introduction for effective revision date.
19:12 15-03-09 [512] User talk:Abd/IP clarify request re reasonable IP edits here.
16:18 15-03-09 [513] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Users continually re-inserting LINKVIO links: more complicated than asserted. AN/I wrong venue to resolve this.
16:08 15-03-09 [514] User talk:Hapsala WP:LINKVIO: add a little
16:07 15-03-09 [515] User talk:Hapsala WP:LINKVIO: be careful about edit warring to assert content, follow WP:DR.
15:58 15-03-09 [516] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist m-monroe.org: the editor should be encouraged to seek specific page local whitelisting or site local whitelisting as appropriate, if that can't be done, delisting attempt would be futile
15:14 15-03-09 [517] User talk:Abd SUCI Page regarding: of course WMC is an admin, a notable one, in fact, mentioned in RS.
15:11 15-03-09 [518] MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist lyricstranslations.com: insufficient evidence to justify blacklisting
15:02 15-03-09 [519] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Users continually re-inserting LINKVIO links: there wasn't prior discussion on Hapsala talk.
14:53 15-03-09 [520] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Users continually re-inserting LINKVIO links: what *specific* violations are claimed? Not shown here.
14:20 15-03-09 [521] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: close this, further discussion not needed. disagree? revert me, please.
14:16 15-03-09 [522] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: fmt, sp
14:15 15-03-09 [523] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: please don't report this IP here, just deal with it, get individual help.
13:52 15-03-09 [524] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Edit warring: fmt
13:51 15-03-09 [525] User talk:Radhakrishnansk Edit warring: this wasn't a content dispute, this was disruption by a banned editor, User:Kuntan
13:29 15-03-09 [526] User talk:Abd SUCI Page regarding: yes, you may revert edits clearly from this banned editor.
05:48 15-03-09 [527] Talk:N ray See-Also to Cold fusion: about removing the see-also again.
05:42 15-03-09 [528] N ray See also: Apples and Oranges appear in lists of Fruit and many sources mention them together. Should Apple have a see-also to Orange?
05:38 15-03-09 [529] User talk:Peter Damian Your question about the block of SA: new section
04:26 15-03-09 [530] Talk:Socialist Unity Centre of India Vanadalism by a Puppet of Banned User:Kuntan: fix section title, note re IP editor as banned User:Kuntan
04:15 15-03-09 [531] Talk:Socialist Unity Centre of India Sarat Chandra is part of the ideology: remove uncivil debate with banned editor. R, you may restore this if you wish, but I advise against it.
04:11 15-03-09 [532] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Edit war at Socialist Unity Centre of India article, breaches of WP:NPA, allegations of sock-puppetry: IP editor acknowledged being banned.
03:57 15-03-09 [533] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 59.91.253.113 reported by Radhakrishnansk(Result: 24h): sheesh. fix link
03:54 15-03-09 [534] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring 59.91.253.113 reported by Radhakrishnansk(Result: 24h): RFCU is unnecessary.
03:42 15-03-09 [535] User talk:Radhakrishnansk remove edits by banned User:Kuntan (Radhakrishnansk may restore if he wishes, of course.)
03:37 15-03-09 [536] User talk:William M. Connolley Undid revision 277317841 by 59.91.253.172 (talk)Banned User:Kuntan
03:02 15-03-09 [537] Patrick Haseldine Guardian letter: sp
02:46 15-03-09 [538] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories: fix link
02:36 15-03-09 [539] User talk:Fritzpoll The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: Calls for your blood? Thicken thy skin, admin!
02:10 15-03-09 [540] User talk:PJHaseldine Yvonne Bradley: fmt
01:58 15-03-09 [541] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: collapse discussion that became flame war
22:48 14-03-09 [542] User talk:PJHaseldine Yvonne Bradley: what's your goal? PJH?
22:25 14-03-09 [543] User talk:Fritzpoll The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: actually, there could be a very simple solution, if you are prepared to take the step. Your call, of course.
22:09 14-03-09 [544] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories: oops! didn't mean to archive the whole damn page!
22:06 14-03-09 [545] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories: close the whole thing, editor topic banned, any other issues, this is now the wrong forum
21:57 14-03-09 [546] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Conspiracy theorist: Resolved: wrong forum.
21:52 14-03-09 [547] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Proposed restrictions on Socrates2008 and Deon Steyn: resolved, no action.
21:45 14-03-09 [548] User talk:Fritzpoll The current MfD for the page that Yvonne Bradley became: new section
21:21 14-03-09 [549] User talk:PJHaseldine Yvonne Bradley: more on this.
21:00 14-03-09 [550] User talk:PJHaseldine Topic-banned: more comment on the situation, especially on the DRV you filed.
17:14 14-03-09 [551] User talk:PJHaseldine Topic-banned: complete sig
16:52 14-03-09 [552] User talk:PJHaseldine Topic-banned: clarify
16:51 14-03-09 [553] User talk:PJHaseldine Topic-banned: advice on how to survive the topic ban, making your position and your cooperation with the community stronger.
16:11 14-03-09 [554] User talk:Abd Edit ban on User:PJHaseldine: Thanks for asking, PJH. I'll look into it. Comment on SPA/COI and experts and how we treat experts.
17:56 13-03-09 [555] Talk:Cold fusion Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: Condensed matter nuclear science
17:46 13-03-09 [556] Talk:Instant-runoff voting American Chemical Society Elections: don't edit the article, Rob, unless it is clearly not controversial.
17:22 13-03-09 [557] User talk:Jayvdb/Archive 7 Abour your permission for fringe-science-banned editor to edit N ray: new section
16:49 13-03-09 [558] User:Synergy/Durova arggh, never did figure out how to keep numbering working with subcomments.
16:48 13-03-09 [559] User:Synergy/Durova explain opposition as due to lack of evidence that Durova has accepted this, not to her incapacity. She is amply capable and never was a problem admin. Mistakes are part of the job.
16:43 13-03-09 [560] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion What does policy say about moving articles to user space when they have been nominated for deletion?: It's *usually* okay if the one moving is sole author and it's only a notability problem.
03:10 13-03-09 [561] User talk:John Nevard Your revert on N ray: new section
02:43 13-03-09 [562] Talk:N ray See-Also to Cold fusion: that a list includes two items does not make them sufficiently related for a See also link.
01:49 13-03-09 [563] User talk:Beantwo Comment on block: actually, many admins *do* think this way.
01:40 13-03-09 [564] User talk:Yousaf465 Reverted edits by Abd (talk) to last version by Beantwo
01:38 13-03-09 [565] User talk:Yousaf465 Reverted 1 edit by Beantwo identified as vandalism to last revision by Yousaf465. (TW)
01:30 13-03-09 [566] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Edits to User talk: Nja247: advice for Beantwo. Hide light under bushel, or collapse box, as the case may be.
18:54 12-03-09 [567] User talk:Beantwo Comment on block: new section
17:59 12-03-09 [568] User talk:Abd Please keep your distance from SA: Wikipedia has made this very easy. Good move, I approve. SA is welcome back if he'll respect the community.
17:44 12-03-09 [569] User talk:Abd Final request: might indeed be his final request, but not at my request.
17:40 12-03-09 [570] N ray Undid revision 276750448 by Hipocrite (talk)See Talk.
17:39 12-03-09 [571] Talk:N ray See-Also to Cold fusion: new section
15:41 12-03-09 [572] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by User:Abd: the request should be quickly declined.
15:27 12-03-09 [573] User talk:Abd Please keep your distance from SA: sp link
15:26 12-03-09 [574] User talk:Abd Please keep your distance from SA: the pattern was clear.
14:40 12-03-09 [575] User talk:Abd Final request: No. But don't worry.
14:26 12-03-09 [576] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ScienceApologist asking for a block: he may have been asking for such. However, the edit did improve the article, apparently. But there is a complication.
14:18 12-03-09 [577] N ray See also: remove link to fringe science article, cold fusion is not pseudoscience, and this link essentially claims that it is.
14:13 12-03-09 [578] User talk:Ryan Postlethwaite Block disputed: /Ryan, you acted properly.
04:25 12-03-09 [579] Instant-runoff voting Undid revision 276659708 by 72.75.19.4 (talk)the source doesn't show what is claimed.
04:25 12-03-09 [580] Talk:Instant-runoff voting American Chemical Society Elections: no, it wasn't last fall, period.
04:12 12-03-09 [581] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement ScienceApologist abusively editing his Talk page.: I was essentially done with the filing of this.
03:57 12-03-09 [582] User talk:Abd User talk:ScienceApologist: we'll muddle by without him.
03:46 12-03-09 [583] User talk:Abd Stay off my talkpage: no problem, since you ask so nicely.
03:38 12-03-09 [584] User talk:Hipocrite Answer to your question: remove section as founded on an error.
03:37 12-03-09 [585] User talk:Hipocrite Answer to your question: apologize before removing.
03:33 12-03-09 [586] User talk:Abd Please keep your distance from SA: sure, no problem, I'm done. He's not blocked, I removed the offensive characterisation.
03:27 12-03-09 [587] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement ScienceApologist abusively editing his Talk page.: new section
03:25 12-03-09 [588] User talk:ScienceApologist background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: likewise
03:25 12-03-09 [589] User talk:ScienceApologist background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: that too. I'm not a "cold fusion promoter," and if I were, it would still be irrelevant.
02:59 12-03-09 [590] User talk:ScienceApologist Undid revision 276662712 by ScienceApologist (talk)sorry, you don't get to do that.
02:53 12-03-09 [591] User talk:Hipocrite Answer to your question: new section
02:15 12-03-09 [592] User:Abd/Sandbox test for blacklisting
20:42 11-03-09 [593] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: swimming through molasses.
20:20 11-03-09 [594] User talk:OMCV cold fusion paper: thanks, OMCV.) (top) [rollback]
17:36 11-03-09 [595] Talk:Cold fusion Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: no thought of bad faith even crossed my mind. On lukewarm fusion.
17:19 11-03-09 [596] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: coming soon to the article, a link to lenr-canr.org
16:41 11-03-09 [597] Talk:Cold fusion Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: format
16:17 11-03-09 [598] Talk:Cold fusion Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: usage isn't informal if used with clear meaning in a field and in a paper title.
16:10 11-03-09 [599] Talk:Cold fusion Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: attribute edit to Phil153
16:05 11-03-09 [600] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: Relative reliability of sources only applies to conflict.
15:41 11-03-09 [601] User talk:Carcharoth My thoughts re fringe science etcetera: SA has been causing long-term damage that may outweigh the total of his contributions.
14:32 11-03-09 [602] Cold fusion If this isn't the right place for this, please put it in the right place. Cover alternate usage of "cold fusion" in the science of nuclear fusion.
14:14 11-03-09 [603] User talk:ScienceApologist background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: sign
14:13 11-03-09 [604] User talk:ScienceApologist background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: note about removal of the first part of this section by SA, but the leaving of response to it.
13:36 11-03-09 [605] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by User:Abd: punct
13:36 11-03-09 [606] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by User:Abd: This was not over spelling. Please read the evidence.
04:20 11-03-09 [607] User talk:ScienceApologist Useless advice: I think I'm done here.
04:10 11-03-09 [608] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: yes. but there are other approaches
03:56 11-03-09 [609] User talk:Enric Naval Warning: Disruptive removal of Talk page discussion.: too late, it's been embedded in History.
03:45 11-03-09 [610] Talk:Cold fusion Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: return to our regular programming.
03:38 11-03-09 [611] Talk:Cold fusion Continued discussion of He Jing-tang paper in Frontiers of Physics in China: there is more than one way to fly
03:25 11-03-09 [612] User talk:ScienceApologist Useless advice: perhaps useless, but this isn't only for SA, it is also for those who are tempted to swallow the revisionist history being presented.
02:49 11-03-09 [613] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: laughter is healthy, contempt not.
02:45 11-03-09 [614] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: the policy is clearer than the guideline
02:27 11-03-09 [615] User talk:Abd Your continued incivility on cold fusion: I'm busy
02:22 11-03-09 [616] User talk:Landed little marsdon Pseudoscience: take it easy, Llm, and good luck. Perhaps not a great idea to parachute into a war zone with no backup.
00:19 11-03-09 [617] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement request removal of topic ban: there does seem to be a problem here.
00:13 11-03-09 [618] User talk:Abd Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: Verbal, glass houses.
00:01 11-03-09 [619] User talk:Abd Proxy posting: to make this clear, what I did was not proxying at all. If Rothwell had edited the *article*, I could revert it back in if I thought it improved the article. So, a Talk comment?
23:55 10-03-09 [620] User talk:Abd Proxy posting: Thanks, Jehochman. Look a little deeper, please.
23:18 10-03-09 [621] Instant-runoff voting leave this or provide year of first election. Thanks for updated cite, Rob.
20:16 10-03-09 [622] User talk:Objectivist ways and means: in olden times.
20:02 10-03-09 [623] User talk:ScienceApologist No, it was not me who complained about a spelling correction, it was User:Hipocrite
19:46 10-03-09 [624] User talk:Enric Naval Warning: Disruptive removal of Talk page discussion.: oops
19:46 10-03-09 [625] User talk:Enric Naval Warning: Disruptive removal of Talk page discussion.: new section
19:12 10-03-09 [626] User talk:Abd Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell
19:04 10-03-09 [627] User talk:Abd Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: Please be careful, Enric.
18:26 10-03-09 [628] User talk:Abd Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: "we already know Jed's opinion"? Willing to stand on that statement?
18:21 10-03-09 [629] User talk:Abd Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: Too bad, Enric. This one is worth taking up the WP:DR ladder.
18:12 10-03-09 [630] User talk:ScienceApologist background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA: sp, punct
18:10 10-03-09 [631] User talk:ScienceApologist background to this block, comment, and suggestion for SA
17:46 10-03-09 [632] User talk:Abd Cold fusion and Jed Rothewell: warning to Verbal
17:41 10-03-09 [633] Talk:Cold fusion He, J., Nuclear fusion inside condense matters. Front. Phys. China: new section
16:44 10-03-09 [634] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 276185987 by Phil153 (talk)rv proper rv of banned editor, as useful for discussion.
14:16 10-03-09 [635] User talk:Abd Your continued incivility on cold fusion: finding my sea legs
03:51 10-03-09 [636] User talk:Abd References: going in circles.
03:22 10-03-09 [637] Talk:Cold fusion Iwamura: respond to Noren, I'd missed thispart of Noren's comment because it got chopped up.
03:04 10-03-09 [638] Talk:Cold fusion Iwamura: add note re splitting of Noren comment by Kevin Baas
02:52 10-03-09 [639] User talk:Abd Barnstar!: do, please, revert blatant vandalism here, I'll see it anyway, but it is better for those who come here for other purposes.
02:36 10-03-09 [640] User talk:Hu12 your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: dropped these words
02:33 10-03-09 [641] User talk:Hu12 your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: well, too bad. cover the points raised by Hu12
01:35 10-03-09 [642] User talk:Abd References: NPOV and stuff
18:38 09-03-09 [643] Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard Proposed restrictions on PJHaseldine: support as temporary, reversible ban
18:20 09-03-09 [644] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: about consensus process and our copyright policy
17:58 09-03-09 [645] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: about consensus process and our copyright policy
17:31 09-03-09 [646] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard User:Amolz: review problem.
16:49 09-03-09 [647] User talk:Amithani sign
16:48 09-03-09 [648] User talk:Amithani Wecome, Mr. Mithani, and a caution.
16:23 09-03-09 [649] Cold fusion additional usage of the term "cold fusion." Lukewarm fusion?
16:16 09-03-09 [650] Talk:Cold fusion More papers mentioning cold fusion.: and here is how open discussion can improve articles, and incivility is stupid.
15:57 09-03-09 [651] Talk:Cold fusion Iwamura: the point about rush, and, definitely, there was a big rush, there is reliable source on that.
15:24 09-03-09 [652] Talk:Cold fusion Iwamura: Thanks for the pointer, Noren.
15:15 09-03-09 [653] Talk:Cold fusion Whitelisting lenr-canr.org and newenergytimes.com?: new section
14:25 09-03-09 [654] Talk:Cold fusion 40 or 50 orders of magnitude: 40-50 orders of magnitude isn't really an argument against cold fusion. I'
04:30 09-03-09 [655] User talk:Carcharoth Fringe science: they *can* be ignored, except that they complicate arbitration enforcement. Someone checking contribs for AE then must check each edit for *content*
04:13 09-03-09 [656] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests move "leave this section" comment text
04:07 09-03-09 [657] Talk:Cold fusion More papers mentioning cold fusion.: the paper do mention "cold fusion" of a kind that Wikipedia doesn't cover. Does anyone care about that?
03:46 09-03-09 [658] Talk:Cold fusion More papers mentioning cold fusion.: remove fragment from failed edit
03:45 09-03-09 [659] Talk:Cold fusion More papers mentioning cold fusion.: maybe I was deluded by "cold fusion in the title" and the fact that they are running fusion of Zr and Mo. Phil did better.
03:29 09-03-09 [660] Talk:Cold fusion Section "Incompatibilities with conventional nuclear physics" must be greatly expanded: okay, sure. But with what?
01:39 09-03-09 [661] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science
01:04 09-03-09 [662] Talk:Cold fusion A Chinese View on Summary of Condensed Matter Nuclear Science: new section
00:52 09-03-09 [663] Talk:Cold fusion Iwamura: new section
22:29 08-03-09 [664] Talk:Cold fusion More papers mentioning cold fusion.: new section
22:06 08-03-09 [665] User talk:Durova ScienceApologist needs a little guidance, perhaps.: Sheesh! That takes the cake, Durova. My condolences.
21:47 08-03-09 [666] Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science 2?: topic bans must be easy to enforce or else they are worse than useless.
21:37 08-03-09 [667] User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): add related paper re neutron detector used.) (top) [rollback]
21:07 08-03-09 [668] Talk:Cold fusion POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: no, not here. I'm not entirely dim.
21:05 08-03-09 [669] User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): fmt
21:05 08-03-09 [670] User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): format, abstract to be added.
21:03 08-03-09 [671] User:Abd/Cold fusion/Sources He Jingtang et al, Study on Anomalous Nuclear Fusion Reaction by using HV Pulse Discharge (1993): create section
19:47 08-03-09 [672] User talk:Phil153 Pseudo pseudoscientists: ditto and why
19:40 08-03-09 [673] User talk:Abd References: thanks, OMCV. Sorry about the risk to your career if you openly discuss.
18:27 08-03-09 [674] Talk:Cold fusion POV problems in "incompatibilities" section: yes. more.
17:46 08-03-09 [675] Talk:Cold fusion Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: fix link
17:45 08-03-09 [676] Talk:Cold fusion Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: remove flying link
17:40 08-03-09 [677] Talk:Cold fusion Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: missed one point Phil made
17:16 08-03-09 [678] Talk:Cold fusion finish response in situ.
16:25 08-03-09 [679] Talk:Cold fusion move section about editor behavior to end of relevant section, it separated the specific discussion from the general one.
16:19 08-03-09 [680] User talk:Abd Your continued incivility on cold fusion: thanks for the warning, Phil. And thanks for the note, Coppertwig.
14:55 08-03-09 [681] Talk:Cold fusion Notice to Abd about battling and tendentious editing: respond.
14:04 08-03-09 [682] Talk:Cold fusion A New Reference: nuclear physicists *are* finding evidence for LENR.
13:45 08-03-09 [683] Talk:Cold fusion A New Reference: close paren
13:44 08-03-09 [684] Talk:Cold fusion A New Reference: redact part of my comment, explore meaning of "the wall." Neutrons.
13:14 08-03-09 [685] User talk:Carcharoth Fringe science: comment on enforcement of topic bans re "harmless" edits.
05:31 08-03-09 [686] User talk:Abd References: line breaks
05:30 08-03-09 [687] User talk:Abd References: conference proceedings, URL for copies
05:15 08-03-09 [688] User talk:Abd References: fix one URL
05:11 08-03-09 [689] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: Thanks, OCMV
04:57 08-03-09 [690] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Statement by User:Abd: evidence and conclusion: clear, explicitly stated disruptive intent.
03:46 08-03-09 [691] Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account Wikipedia:Vandalism-only account: keep
03:39 08-03-09 [692] Wikipedia:Vandalism Undid revision 275729561 by Abd (talk)on second thought .. this should be discussed before being in Policy.
03:32 08-03-09 [693] Talk:Cold fusion A New Reference: LSD's confidence isn't a measure of RS.
03:22 08-03-09 [694] Talk:Cold fusion A New Reference: perhaps if we start growing aircraft from seeds, we might well ask the Royal Agricultural Society about aeronautics.
02:54 08-03-09 [695] Wikipedia:Vandalism Undid revision 275484241 by Hipocrite (talk)don't think Hipocrite understood this. See Talk.
02:48 08-03-09 [696] User talk:Abd Barnstar!: "I'm not entirely dim, you know, after all, I am the Supreme Lord." --God, in Time Bandits
01:05 08-03-09 [697] Rashad Khalifa Undid revision 275412757 by Siriusgray (talk)nothing to do with Rashad Khalifa
22:26 07-03-09 [698] User talk:Abd Barnstar!: thanks to those who reverted. Booby prize to the editor who reverted vandalism back in and who wasn't me.
22:17 07-03-09 [699] User talk:Abd thanks to those who reverted vandalism on my page. I'm choosing to show this, but the removals were correct and appreciated.
22:09 07-03-09 [700] Wikipedia:Requests for page protection User talk:Abd (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs): oops
22:09 07-03-09 [701] Wikipedia:Requests for page protection Requesting full protection of User talk:Abd. (TW)
22:06 07-03-09 [702] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: What, trial first, then verdict? What will the Queen say?
22:04 07-03-09 [703] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: Nobody here has claimed that the 2004 DOE review isn't a reliable source for the "mainstream" view in 2004.
17:23 07-03-09 [704] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests Request for clarification : Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science: comment suggesting strict enforcement with practical limitation
16:49 07-03-09 [705] User talk:Jehochman Science Apologist toe across the line: fmt
16:47 07-03-09 [706] User talk:Jehochman Science Apologist toe across the line: the issue is not spelling corrections. The issue is WP:POINT violation and suspected intent to disrupt Arbitration enforcement.
16:09 07-03-09 [707] Talk:Cold fusion Query: respond to SA and V.
15:11 07-03-09 [708] Talk:Cold fusion Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: Thanks, Coppertwig, and about tl;dr.
14:20 07-03-09 [709] Talk:Cold fusion Discussion with and about Minhducthandan's edits here: enough, Minhducthandan.
14:11 07-03-09 [710] Talk:Cold fusion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: refactor to separate discussion irrelevant to section on calorimetry article, create new section, "Discussion...."
13:49 07-03-09 [711] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: what's actually said.
13:12 07-03-09 [712] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: at last, someone figures out what I was doing. Thanks, Phil.
12:55 07-03-09 [713] User talk:Abd Explain, please: what SA could do if his intention is truly helpful.
12:42 07-03-09 [714] User talk:Durova ScienceApologist needs a little guidance, perhaps.: Does SA actually have a mentor?
12:37 07-03-09 [715] User talk:Durova ScienceApologist needs a little guidance, perhaps.: gosh, ChildofMidnight may need to read WP:AGF and my comments more carefully.
00:58 07-03-09 [716] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: please be specific about contradiction.
00:53 07-03-09 [717] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: nobody suggested we should give equal prominence to minority views.
00:46 07-03-09 [718] User talk:Abd AGF: thanks for sharing, Hipocrite.
18:03 06-03-09 [719] User:Synergy/Durova Oppose, because founded on assumption of prior unworthiness.
17:56 06-03-09 [720] User talk:Durova Ohai: she never was not ready.
17:48 06-03-09 [721] User talk:Durova User:ScienceApologist| needs a little guidance, perhaps.: new section
17:33 06-03-09 [722] User talk:Jehochman Science Apologist toe across the line: new section
17:00 06-03-09 [723] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 DEA Chief of Public Affairs: note about reversion.
16:59 06-03-09 [724] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 DEA Chief of Public Affairs: about the Category:Drug Enforcement Administration abbreviations and not about editing article again.
16:57 06-03-09 [725] Garrison Courtney Undid revision 275421204 by Abd (talk)oops
16:56 06-03-09 [726] Garrison Courtney Undid revision 275421511 by Abd (talk)oops
16:41 06-03-09 [727] Garrison Courtney External links: inconstent capitalization and usage (DEA? Drug Enforcement Administration?)
16:39 06-03-09 [728] Garrison Courtney External links: more specific category
16:37 06-03-09 [729] Meredith Thompson References: oops
16:36 06-03-09 [730] Meredith Thompson References: Remove obvious spelling error in title of book, unlikely. Possible old vandalism? Didn't check. Place in specific category.
16:31 06-03-09 [731] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 DEA Chief of Public Affairs: wrong approach. Content of articles takes precedence over CfD process.
16:02 06-03-09 [732] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: my approach to balance with apparent conflict between sources.
04:48 06-03-09 [733] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: testimony is presumed true unless controverted.
04:26 06-03-09 [734] User talk:Abd Explain, please: thanks, Enric. That was correct.
04:18 06-03-09 [735] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: thanks for your reply, OMCV
03:54 06-03-09 [736] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 DEA Chief of Public Affairs: Technically, the category wasn't emptied during the CfD process. It was empty for ten minutes before. How's that?
15:25 05-03-09 [737] User talk:Abd Ignorant? That's uncivil, and gratuitously so, besides being wrong. I know the history of this, I've been spending a lot of time reviewing article history.
02:01 05-03-09 [738] User talk:Abd Explain, please: this incident could not be clearer as "disrupting Wikipedia to make a point."
01:39 05-03-09 [739] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement User:ScienceApologist: I conclude this is a WP:POINT violation by User:Hypocrite. Took me a while to figure it out, I thought he was trying to be helfpul.
01:30 05-03-09 [740] Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement User:Abd: eh? puzzled.
01:24 05-03-09 [741] User talk:Abd Explain, please: eh? who? what?
01:22 05-03-09 [742] User talk:Abd Explain, please: make it clear that this is not directed to Hipocrite
01:18 05-03-09 [743] User talk:Abd Explain, please: okay, explanation. Thanks for asking.
01:06 05-03-09 [744] Cold fusion Undid revision 275058906 by Hipocrite (talk)accept edit by SA.
00:55 05-03-09 [745] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 DEA Chief of Public Affairs: A category with only one member isn't a category, really. It's just a characterstic, as a category, of no value.
00:44 05-03-09 [746] User talk:Abd Cold fusion: hmm... did you also suggest to Phil153, who is the one who brought up parapsychology, that it was off-topic?
00:29 05-03-09 [747] Talk:Cold fusion Undid revision 275050059 by ScienceApologist (talk)stay away, SA, per ArbComm.
00:12 05-03-09 [748] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: ISI is owned by Thomson Reuters, which is in partnership with HEP for the Frontiers series.
23:56 04-03-09 [749] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: what does "parapsychology" mean in a psychology journal article title? That the publisher is wacko? Really?
23:51 04-03-09 [750] User talk:Abd Question: it's both a fact and generally accepted among those who have a clue! Look at our article on sonofusion. "Hot enough to ...."
23:40 04-03-09 [751] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: what contradiction, exactly, do you have in mind? Citations, please.
23:23 04-03-09 [752] Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard Frontiers of Physics in China.: new section
22:34 04-03-09 [753] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: Collecting all the evidence on one side and ignoring the evidence on the other is called "POV pushing."
22:23 04-03-09 [754] User talk:Abd Question: respond to Minhducthandan.
22:11 04-03-09 [755] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: Fusor not related to cold fusion at all.
22:04 04-03-09 [756] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: find some reliable source!
21:53 04-03-09 [757] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: sauce for one paragraph is sauce for all.
21:52 04-03-09 [758] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: use the same standards for all sides.
21:38 04-03-09 [759] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 single-member category, not needed Abd (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2009 (UTC): this is as clear as mud. maybe we know how to write an encyclopedia, but not an instruction manual.
21:36 04-03-09 [760] Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 March 4 NEW NOMINATIONS: DEA Chief of Public Affairs - intrinsically single-member category
21:23 04-03-09 [761] Garrison Courtney External links: remove single-member category
21:17 04-03-09 [762] User talk:Ron Ritzman AfD relistings and closes.: changed my mind, author may have been the subject.
21:08 04-03-09 [763] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: make it clear that this discussion includes non-admin closers
21:05 04-03-09 [764] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: word
21:04 04-03-09 [765] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: the issue here, it's worth exploring.
20:18 04-03-09 [766] User talk:Ron Ritzman AfD relistings and closes.: explain the Delete decision
20:12 04-03-09 [767] User talk:Ron Ritzman AfD relistings and closes.: relisting doesn 't save any work at all. It is appropriate, sometimes, when there has been some disruption. Closing saves work, if well done.
19:39 04-03-09 [768] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: stuff
19:03 04-03-09 [769] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: electron shells aren't a barrier to fusion. They can be absent at room temperature.
18:30 04-03-09 [770] Talk:University of Atlanta DETC: how about the article on Educational accreditation
18:02 04-03-09 [771] Talk:University of Atlanta History of this institution: opinionated, not poignant.
17:56 04-03-09 [772] Talk:University of Atlanta History of this institution: DETC application history could be verified.
17:50 04-03-09 [773] Talk:University of Atlanta Sister school's difficulties: about Iversion
17:48 04-03-09 [774] University of Atlanta External links: at Beetstra's suggestion, killing the stub marker
17:26 04-03-09 [775] Talk:University of Atlanta 2004 sale to a company run by Akber Mithani: pretty good. What happened then. This establishes that the Mathanis bought Barrington and CENUCO?
17:15 04-03-09 [776] Talk:University of Atlanta South Florida Business Journal articles: tie this to UofA? In a way we can use in the article?
16:53 04-03-09 [777] User talk:Abd UofA.edu: whatever
16:40 04-03-09 [778] User talk:Abd European Association for Distance Learning: sorry for the inconvenience.
16:37 04-03-09 [779] Talk:European Association for Distance Learning Notability: sign it -- original time of edit) (top) [rollback]
16:35 04-03-09 [780] Talk:University of Atlanta 2003 Rutland Herald article: Thanks, A. B. Hope you find this hobby rewarding. It's kind of fun, isn't it?
16:16 04-03-09 [781] Talk:University of Atlanta History of this institution: the Barrington "trouble" cited was basically a paperwork glitch, it's not clear what the substance was. They were moving!
16:13 04-03-09 [782] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: fix name of ancestor of University of Atlanta
16:04 04-03-09 [783] User talk:Abd UofA.edu: I don't agree that the blacklisting was necessary, but that's a minor issue for now.
15:53 04-03-09 [784] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: respond to drive-by nasty comment.
15:03 04-03-09 [785] User talk:Abd UofA.edu: I'll look at it. I don't see any emergency here.
15:00 04-03-09 [786] User talk:Abd Initimdation: is it intimidation to remind people that what they do is visible? If what they are doing is fine, where is the intimidation? There was no threat of action.
04:48 04-03-09 [787] User:Abd/Sandbox test link
04:29 04-03-09 [788] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: fah! it's late.
03:58 04-03-09 [789] Cold fusion How did this incorrect title, misspelled, end up here?
03:11 04-03-09 [790] Cold fusion Bibliography: add URL to NY Times source.
03:06 04-03-09 [791] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: Phil, you mistook the third "violation of known physics" for the first.
02:45 04-03-09 [792] Talk:Cold fusion Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: sure. read Goodstein (1994), which is cited in the article multiple times.
02:42 04-03-09 [793] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: it's reliable source, on the face. Think it isn't, you'll have to impeach it with clear evidence, not circular argument.
02:11 04-03-09 [794] User talk:Ron Ritzman AfD relistings and closes.: fix some stuff
02:08 04-03-09 [795] User talk:Ron Ritzman AfD relistings and closes.: new section
01:41 04-03-09 [796] User talk:Ron Ritzman February 2009: sorry about the "warning." Luck of the draw.
22:55 03-03-09 [797] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Lyrikline.org: Yes, cool. I think it's going to be worth the effort. Request comment on intentions.
22:51 03-03-09 [798] Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poetry Lyrikline.org: okay, we can possibly add lyrikline links to several hundred articles, and may eventually gain several hundred new articles.
22:19 03-03-09 [799] Talk:Cold fusion The probability of reaction.: new section
22:04 03-03-09 [800] Talk:Cold fusion Kowalski and Mosier-Boss et al (2008): preposterous above, so preposterous here.
21:54 03-03-09 [801] Talk:Cold fusion Treatment of muon-catalyzed fusion in this article.: Naturewissenschaften an "off topic journal"???
21:27 03-03-09 [802] Talk:Cold fusion Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: more on this.
20:45 03-03-09 [803] Talk:Cold fusion Goodstein's analysis of the cold fusion history: new section
20:02 03-03-09 [804] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: prior 1993 article from this author related to cold fusion.
19:05 03-03-09 [805] Talk:Cold fusion Back to mediation?: filenames of deleted pages?
19:02 03-03-09 [806] Talk:Cold fusion Holy Grail Found? -- 2007 Review article: new section
18:37 03-03-09 [807] Garrison Courtney External links: just too peripheral.
18:36 03-03-09 [808] Garrison Courtney External links: remove dead link. I think this document had a bio in it, not sure this should have been linked at all, unless page reference were given?
18:31 03-03-09 [809] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: why relisters should then !vote Delete or at least support delete.
18:13 03-03-09 [810] User talk:Zetawoof Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: I understand, I apologize. Will you be more careful next time?
15:25 03-03-09 [811] Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) Is edit-warring the way we establish consensus?: No; however, it can establish "rough consensus," a kind of default.
03:21 03-03-09 [812] Chicago Police Department Notable former officers: add police officer to name to distinguish from other Pete Kelly
03:20 03-03-09 [813] Chicago Police Department Notable former officers: wikify. Maybe someone will create an article, or source this. cn tag it.
03:19 03-03-09 [814] Chicago Police Department Undid revision 274087684 by 24.211.34.78 (talk) actually, no article means no article.
03:16 03-03-09 [815] User talk:Pilkington1984 March 2009: new section) (top) [rollback]
03:06 03-03-09 [816] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: now that the AfD has closed as No Consensus....
02:53 03-03-09 [817] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: thanks, Ron. More discussion is not necessarily better if it's not efficient.
02:40 03-03-09 [818] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Conclusions re Fringe: place Phil's suggestion as alternative accepted by me.
02:31 03-03-09 [819] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Proposed close of this issue: quote
02:30 03-03-09 [820] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Conclusions re document alteration: say it isn't so.
02:23 03-03-09 [821] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Lenr-canr.org allegedly alters documents: sp
02:21 03-03-09 [822] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Proposed close of this issue: the question about "fringe" is with respect to the instant issue, one specific link, not overall policy.
02:15 03-03-09 [823] Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Scrubbing old reverted vandalism from edit history.: Bad idea.
02:08 03-03-09 [824] Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) Proposed exception rule for the mediawiki blacklist: I don't think exception rules are possible with the present software. However, it's easy to have a URL without the http://
01:34 03-03-09 [825] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Proposed close of this issue: fix quotation of Phil153
01:27 03-03-09 [826] User talk:Ron Ritzman February 2009: ten closures (as "relisted") in five minutes?
23:50 02-03-09 [827] Wikipedia talk:Deletion process Relisting after more than "one or two commenting editors": current example of problem relisting
23:31 02-03-09 [828] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Re voting by IP editor/vandal who is the nominator: went back and reverted myself, based on certain convincing arguments. Then struck *just the vote*. Sock.) (top) [rollback]
23:29 02-03-09 [829] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: routine relisting by a single editor is the same as routine closing by one editor.
23:09 02-03-09 [830] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: assisting a vandal isn't "cleanup." It's extending a mess.
21:45 02-03-09 [831] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Lenr-canr.org allegedly hosts copyright violations: why I accepted new statement of consensus.
21:41 02-03-09 [832] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Lenr-canr.org allegedly hosts copyright violations: accept modification as harmless and increasing consensus, pull A. B. comment into collapse box, and sign it for him.
21:34 02-03-09 [833] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: do we have a guideline?
21:32 02-03-09 [834] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: remove comment based on erroneous understanding.
21:28 02-03-09 [835] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: delete comment founded on incorrect understanding of page creation rights. Live and learn.
21:22 02-03-09 [836] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney be careful about being helpful to vandals with an axe to grind.
21:12 02-03-09 [837] User talk:Ron Ritzman February 2009: I reverted myself on the one reversal I did of your relistings.
21:08 02-03-09 [838] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp Reverted edits by Abd (talk) to last version by 24.211.34.78
21:07 02-03-09 [839] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relisting of AfD nominated by IP/SPA vandal: respond to DGG. Correct given the vandalism and the bypass of editing restrictions for new editors?
21:03 02-03-09 [840] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion Relisting? Why?: new section
20:42 02-03-09 [841] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: add link to AN/I report
20:41 02-03-09 [842] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Undid revision 274507089 by Abd (talk)decided to unstrike the argument, leaving the !vote striken.
20:09 02-03-09 [843] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Re voting by IP editor who is the nominator: add link to AN/I report
20:05 02-03-09 [844] Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney why I reverted the reversion of my strikeout. There isn't any reasonable doubt, we don't need SSP reports for what is blatantly obvious.
20:02 02-03-09 [845] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Undid revision 274473422 by Whpq (talk)see the contributions, it is *blatant*. I'll also comment in Talk.
19:58 02-03-09 [846] User talk:Zetawoof Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: fmt
19:58 02-03-09 [847] User talk:Zetawoof Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: spiffy barnstar, there. I guess it depends on whom you help.
19:54 02-03-09 [848] User talk:Zetawoof Your helpful assistance to an IP editor/SPA/vandal.: new section
19:46 02-03-09 [849] User talk:Pilkington1984 Your AfD is being discussed at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents: new section
19:43 02-03-09 [850] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: give this a subhead which raises the specific issue with this specific report.
19:39 02-03-09 [851] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: this relisting was a decision by an editor that the community should carefully consider the suggestion of an IP vandal/SPA.
17:58 02-03-09 [852] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Relistings of AfDs by non-administrators: respond to Djsasso
17:51 02-03-09 [853] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp Undid revision 274284675 by Ron Ritzman (talk)just leave it alone (prior edit removed IP vote)
17:50 02-03-09 [854] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma Statehood Stamp Undid revision 274381482 by 24.211.34.78 (talk)just leave it alone!
17:49 02-03-09 [855] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Abusive relistings of AfDs: some may be appropriate.
17:41 02-03-09 [856] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Request admin attention to SPA vandal nomination of WP:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney: change section head to Abusive relistings of AfDs
17:39 02-03-09 [857] User talk:Ron Ritzman February 2009: will be reverting relistings
17:35 02-03-09 [858] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Request admin attention to SPA vandal nomination of WP:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney: new section
16:46 02-03-09 [859] User talk:Ron Ritzman February 2009: new section
16:37 02-03-09 [860] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney strike revote by SPA-vandal nominator
16:31 02-03-09 [861] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: strike sock !vote
16:29 02-03-09 [862] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: note that !Delete vote is by the nominator, who began by vandalizing the article.
16:22 02-03-09 [863] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: shout it from the rooftops
16:21 02-03-09 [864] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: note SPA character of nominator
16:17 02-03-09 [865] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: reopen by Ritzman was abusive and contrary to how AfD works to minimize disruption.
16:07 02-03-09 [866] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: an SPA led us by the nose.
15:44 02-03-09 [867] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: Are multiple marginal causes of notability additive? Is the position notable?
06:47 02-03-09 [868] Talk:European Association for Distance Learning Notability: stuff found rummaging about.
06:29 02-03-09 [869] Talk:European Association for Distance Learning Notability: they had a different name before 1999.
05:35 02-03-09 [870] Talk:University of Atlanta European Association for Distance Learning: UofA does provide "distance learning in Europe."
05:09 02-03-09 [871] User talk:Abd/JzG in Talk:Cold fusion: feed the hobgoblin) (top) [rollback]
05:08 02-03-09 [872] User talk:Abd/JzG at m:Talk:Spam blacklist: add allegation of copyvio at failed RfAr request
04:55 02-03-09 [873] User talk:Abd/JzG in archives for Talk:Cold fusion: add Martin Fleischmann comments re copyvio
04:51 02-03-09 [874] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Conclusions re Fringe: Arthur Rubin, will you reconsider?
04:32 02-03-09 [875] Talk:Martin Fleischmann General Discussion of this process: sign it
04:31 02-03-09 [876] Talk:Martin Fleischmann General Discussion of this process: about the closings and about proceeding.
04:21 02-03-09 [877] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Links to lenr-canr.org were allegedly linkspammed: resolved
04:17 02-03-09 [878] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Link was allegedly inserted by JedRothwell, alleged POV-pusher and COI: resolved
04:13 02-03-09 [879] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Lenr-canr.org allegedly hosts copyright violations: resolved.
03:55 02-03-09 [880] Talk:Martin Fleischmann Should readers be given a link to the paper where they can read it?: fix conclusion sections, intention to close some sections, noncontroversial
03:21 02-03-09 [881] User talk:Abd/JzG in Talk for Cold fusion: head
03:21 02-03-09 [882] User talk:Abd/JzG in articles: head
03:19 02-03-09 [883] User talk:Abd/JzG in Talk for Cold fusion: bullets not numbers
03:19 02-03-09 [884] User talk:Abd/JzG in articles: bullets not numbers
03:17 02-03-09 [885] User talk:Abd/JzG in archives for Talk:Cold fusion: at meta
02:03 02-03-09 [886] User talk:Abd/JzG in articles: in Talk and in Talk archives
01:08 02-03-09 [887] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: what makes a school "extremely" minor as distinct from simply "minor."?
01:00 02-03-09 [888] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: about that UM Broadcast Journalism Department site search.
00:57 02-03-09 [889] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: Note that references added, and it's easy to find "Section Chief, Public Affairs, DEA."
00:35 02-03-09 [890] Garrison Courtney Border and Transportation Security Directorate? US Immigration and Customs Enforcement? Souce says the former, a red link. The Directorate exists.
00:13 02-03-09 [891] Garrison Courtney remove DEA Museum assertion, source not quickly found.
00:12 02-03-09 [892] Garrison Courtney link to Palm Beach Post copy of South Florida Sun-Sentinel article referring to Courtney as Public Affairs chief for the DEA, a few days ago.
23:59 01-03-09 [893] Garrison Courtney Note to self: Preview before hitting Save.
23:57 01-03-09 [894] Garrison Courtney source NoMoCo editorship.
23:47 01-03-09 [895] Garrison Courtney fix link
23:46 01-03-09 [896] Garrison Courtney Until something better and more direct comes up, as I'm sure it will
23:35 01-03-09 [897] Garrison Courtney Reference Katherine Harris job.
23:14 01-03-09 [898] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrison Courtney Garrison Courtney: Keep. So stub it!
23:05 01-03-09 [899] User talk:Hu12 your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: sp
23:03 01-03-09 [900] User talk:Hu12 your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: Thanks again.
17:56 01-03-09 [901] Talk:Cold fusion re CR-39 evidence and blacklisting: urge anyone still highly skeptical to read this. Skepticism is still appropriate, but ....
17:43 01-03-09 [902] Talk:Cold fusion re CR-39 evidence and blacklisting: I think Shanahan may appreciate the simplicity of this.
17:41 01-03-09 [903] Talk:Cold fusion re CR-39 evidence and blacklisting: more than one way to skin a cat. Ah! Ugly metaphor, eh?
17:38 01-03-09 [904] Talk:Cold fusion Kowalski and Mosier-Boss et al (2008): create new subsection.
17:29 01-03-09 [905] Talk:Ernst Jandl propose lyrikline link
17:25 01-03-09 [906] Talk:Marie Luise Kaschnitz fix link
17:24 01-03-09 [907] Talk:Mascha Kaléko propose lyrikline link) (top) [rollback]
17:21 01-03-09 [908] Talk:Marie Luise Kaschnitz propose lyrikline link.
17:16 01-03-09 [909] Talk:Michael Lentz Link to Author page on Lyrikline.org: new section
17:10 01-03-09 [910] Talk:Paul Maar Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: remove redundant sig.
17:10 01-03-09 [911] Talk:Paul Maar Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: move wayward text
17:08 01-03-09 [912] Talk:Paul Maar Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: add note re language, this author's page doesn't have English translations.
17:02 01-03-09 [913] Talk:Paul Maar Link to Paul Marr page on Lyrikline.org: new section
16:50 01-03-09 [914] User talk:Abd regarding the whitelisting.: the blacklisting was definitely inhibiting the use of Lyrikline.org as a reference.
16:39 01-03-09 [915] Harris Khalique add reflist
16:36 01-03-09 [916] Harris Khalique Writing: remove unnecessary peacock
16:29 01-03-09 [917] Talk:Amanda Stewart Amanda Stewart page on Lyrikline.org now linked: new section) (top) [rollback]
16:26 01-03-09 [918] Amanda Stewart restore now-whitelisted link previously removed without discussion, add link info, remove redundant "reference") (top) [rollback]
16:18 01-03-09 [919] Shona language Possible external link for this article.: adding the proposed link to Lyrikline.org page for Chirikure Chirikure) (top) [rollback]
16:18 01-03-09 [920] Talk:Shona language External links: add link to Shona example, with audio of Chirikure Chirikure reading his work, and translations, see Talk.
15:56 01-03-09 [921] User talk:Abd University of Atlanta: thanks for your help
15:32 01-03-09 [922] User talk:Hu12 your watching of links to Lyrikline.org: new section
15:25 01-03-09 [923] User talk:Misarxist Your requested whitelisting of lyrikline.org page: Ultimately, your request led to whitelisting.
15:21 01-03-09 [924] Talk:Michael Krüger (writer) Michael Kruger page at lyrikline.org: whitelisted link added.) (top) [rollback]
15:20 01-03-09 [925] Michael Krüger (writer) External links: wikify German language) (top) [rollback]
15:18 01-03-09 [926] Michael Krüger (writer) External links: add Lyrikline.org link per Talk.
07:48 01-03-09 [927] User talk:Abd/JzG #NAME?
07:48 01-03-09 [928] User talk:Abd/JzG Edits asserting copyright violation: new section
07:28 01-03-09 [929] User talk:Orlady Thanks for your work with University of Atlanta: new section
07:10 01-03-09 [930] Talk:University of Atlanta History of this institution: Barrington appears to have begun the accreditation process, completed as UofA.
07:06 01-03-09 [931] Talk:University of Atlanta European Association for Distance Learning: sign it
07:06 01-03-09 [932] Talk:University of Atlanta European Association for Distance Learning: on this.
06:46 01-03-09 [933] User talk:Abd regarding the whitelisting.: content should be King, not fighting spam. Original editor COI is moot once content has been reviewed by independent editors.
06:30 01-03-09 [934] Talk:European Association for Distance Learning Notability: Not up to me!
01:46 01-03-09 [935] User talk:Abd External Link Spamming: rudeness isn't policy.
01:29 01-03-09 [936] User talk:Abd External Link Spamming: reply to Enric.
01:25 01-03-09 [937] User talk:Abd External Link Spamming: Apology for ABF requested.
![[189]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Triple_tracks_in_CR-39.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=279418641){kind=link}
![[194]](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Triple_tracks_in_CR-39.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=279408399){kind=link}