Template talk:Smile

Latest comment: 2 years ago by EpicPupper in topic Edit request
WikiProject iconDepartment of Fun Template‑class Bottom‑importance
WikiProject iconThis template is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
BottomThis template has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale.

Examples edit

  • {{subst:Smile}}




  • {{subst:Smile|[[User:Example User]]}}




  • {{subst:Smile|~~~}}




  • {{subst:Smile|[[User:Example User]]|Example User}}




  • {{subst:Smile|[[User:Example User]]|~~~~}}




  • {{subst:Smile|~~~|~~~~}}


Chain-letterish. edit

Probably the spread the wikilove part should be removed – albeit well-intentioned – so people don't complain about the chain-letterish aspect. I was going to be bold and do it myself but I'd rather someone else did. — Nathan (Got something to say? Say it.) 21:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Could be tweaked to, smile to relieve wikistress... etc. - RoyBoy 800 14:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
There is a copy at User:Templateuser/Smile --GeorgeMoney T·C 16:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'm also taking suggestions at User:Cowman109/smileproposal. I have nothing against changing the smile template to something less chain-letteresque. Cowman109Talk 20:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Smiles good, chain-letters bad. -- Ned Scott 02:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Why is the TFD message still appearing on the template? edit

Why? savidan(talk) (e@) 12:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

It isn't: I removed it here (revision as of 22:34, 31 May 2006). The message wasn't originally bracketed with noinclude, so any versions of it that were substed between 03:57, 21 May 2006 and 04:13, 28 May 2006 will still have the TFD message in. Remove it by hand if it's bothering you. --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\talk 12:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Forecolour edit

I noticed on this user page that the forecolour attribute isn't specified in the div used for the smile templates, so the text came out white (the user asked me to add color: #FFFFFF at the top): I tried finding the template myself to alter this, but got lost in a circle of redirects!

Basically, all the needs doing is to add color: #000000; to the style section at the beginning of the div, which should ensure future versions display fine in every user page.

Regards,

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 16:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

What's the opposite of Template:Smile? edit

Template:Finger!

I enjoyed that. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 05:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The idea of giving "Template:Finger" to User:LBHS Cheerleader and User:Mmbabies makes me grin! The only problem is it would probably make matters worse. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
If I used that, would that be considered "vandalism"? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ah, but "The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference". Failed, you have. -- Ned Scott 05:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
But it did make me laugh. I have to admit, I tend to roll my eyes when I see a "smile" template on someone's talk page. -- Ned Scott 05:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Incorect you be, for I talk not of love, but of smiles. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 23:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Bah! Forget it. The opposite of a smile could just as well be interpreted as a frown. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 00:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Here is my interpretation of Template:Indifference. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 23:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Not as funny huh. --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 06:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I must have missed this due to my bloated watch list, but I think you might be on to something there :D (<- the irony!) -- Ned Scott 06:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I disagree, if you where to place emotions in a 1D space domain with love being positive and hate being negative and indifference being uh "zero" then they would be opposite. When you add other emotions each of which belong to their own dimension of emotional space it is most likely that "zero" would represent indifference or maybe death or both most likely. Or it may be possible that emotions don't have "opposites" where all dimensions of the emotional space are positive. Therefore hate and love would be independent of each other and it would be possible to hate and love someone equally. And therefore the question of opposite of love is in it self a flawed question. Indeed everyone behaves differently and is capable of differing emotions, therefore this question is entirely dependent on perspective, and therefore can not be generalized to every human being. Yet, this all depends on a greater understanding of psychology (which I do not have). --ANONYMOUS COWARD0xC0DE 06:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
How about this:
  You havee been recognized as the most rediculas Wikipedian of the month!
{{{1}}}

or:

  You have been recognized as "Vandal of the month"
{{{1}}}

GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"All men are created equal, but ambition, or lack of it, soon separates them." How about putting that on a template? --Obaidz96 (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please revise if you agree with me edit

I would like you to look again at the message. For clarity, the message should include also the name of the recipient. For example: "[[User:Example|User]] has smiled at you, [[User:Recipient|Recipient]]!" I would very much appreciate if you fixed it, because it reads awkward the way it is now without the spelled-out name of the recipient. All visitors read it like it was meant for them. Thanks. --Poeticbent talk 05:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Implemented alongside some other stuff. — neuro(talk)(review) 14:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Usage edit

Can I use this file to create another template? April809User:April809 17:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pirate Frown edit

This is the opposite of Smile , PIRATE FROWN!

Looks pretty funny , huh? Well , hope you ike it as I spent my time making this. Start Frowning! {{subst:PirateFrown}}

Broken problems edit

This template is broken. Whenever I create a new section, underneath one of these templates that someone else has left, it puts my username in the smile box. See smile 1 and smile 2. That's the second time this has happened to me. Please fix. Thanks. -- Quiddity (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Permission to add my template edit

I would like to link my template: User:WVRMad/Smileback to the bottom of the template along with Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Would the community support this? WVRMADTalk Guestbook 18:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

adding parametrization edit

Hello there, it would be fun if we could add our own smile image into a parameter, I always substitute the smile with a grin. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 21:04, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Confusing subst default edit

This template defaulting to reporting a smile from "the last user to post on the page, not the user who left the message" when somebody forgets to subst it seems unnecessarily confusing. Should it perhaps just default to "a user has smiled at you!" with a boring explanation underneath explaining that they forgot to sign the comment and you can find out who they were by checking your talk page history? --McGeddon (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Subst needed edit

Is there a way that this template can force a user to Substitute it, just as some of the more serious templates do? When it's put on a user talk page without substitution it produces the silly message that the last person to edit the page has "Smiled", and this can be very inappropriate. PamD 10:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit request edit

Please change:

This template must be substituted, see template:smile for instructions

to:

This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions

  Thank you 🐶EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 18:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

To editor EpicPupper:   done, and thank you very much! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 11:19, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  Thank you 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 16:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)Reply