Template talk:Networker

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Mattbuck in topic Proposed?

Proposed?

edit

How can the Class 168 be proposed? By all accounts it exists and isn't listed as a networker. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Class 325

edit

The Class 325 not a networker, it is more related to the Mk3 family, unlike the electric networkers it has a DC/synchronous traction system rather then Three Phase GTO, the bodyshell is that of a Cl319. The only thing from a Networker is the cab!