Template talk:MAMilitary
Latest comment: 4 years ago by RobDuch in topic Reduction to current installations
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Reduction to current installations
editWill I receive any opposition if I create another template for former military installations in Massachusetts? That data took much effort to compile, mostly by another editor, and served as a useful indexing tool for the many former installations that have articles. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 07:27, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- That's still much, much too big for a navbox. If there's a need for more organization than the category system, I would instead recommend creating List of military installations in Massachusetts instead. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Now I'm thinking of a navbox for the former forts, military reservations, and camps (only) plus the list article. The camps are negotiable. Also, please give me a few days to separate "MEMilitary" (Maine) into active and inactive navboxes. That's a much smaller navbox. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 20:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've separated the Maine navboxes in my sandbox User:RobDuch/sandbox/template3, planning to implement today. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 23:50, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Now I'm thinking of a navbox for the former forts, military reservations, and camps (only) plus the list article. The camps are negotiable. Also, please give me a few days to separate "MEMilitary" (Maine) into active and inactive navboxes. That's a much smaller navbox. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 20:49, 8 July 2020 (UTC)