Template:Did you know nominations/Wer unterm Schutz des Höchsten steht

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bilorv (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Wer unterm Schutz des Höchsten steht

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 21:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC).

  • – I suggest a different wording that cuts out the hefty verbage of "has been recommended to be used". I've also capitalised "Liturgy of the Hours" as per that article; however, I'm not well-versed (semi-intended pun) enough to know the proper form, but whichever you use should be harmonised with the link in the article itself. Outside of this, the article was created within 7 days of nomination and looks good for such an obscure topic. It's right on the edge, but long enough. I'm not religious myself, but I know it has a very wide audience. - Floydian τ ¢ 01:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
    • ALT1: ... that the use of "Wer unterm Schutz des Höchsten steht", a song paraphrasing Psalm 91, has been recommended instead of the psalm in the Liturgy of the Hours, and for memorial services after disasters?
      Thank you for the review and fine wording. Please see top of User talk:Drmies (about indenting, I did it here) - Every time I mention a psalm these days it's in memory of Yoninah who contributed A LOT to them. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
      Oh, nifty! I wasn't aware that the colons and asterisks could go back and forth in one indentation nor of the HTML mess it creates by not following the previous reply. Anyways, ALT1, ich bin nicht so gut in Deutsch. - Floydian τ ¢ 17:35, 20 March 2021 (UTC)