Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/W. Stanley Proctor

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

W. Stanley Proctor edit

(
)

Created/expanded by Doug Coldwell (talk), 7&6=thirteen (talk). Nominated by Doug Coldwell (talk) at 14:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC).

Exclusive of tables, references and wiki markup, the article was 182 characters when Doug started work on it. He took it to 3812 characters. This is more than a 5X expansion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:45, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  • On August 13 the article was 898 characters when I started the expansion. The article was submitted to DYK on August 15, two days later. The size of the article is 4889 characters = 5.44 times, with age of 2 days.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Ah, the case is more simple than I thought. Okay, I ran DYK check on [1] which has 883 characters of prose. Then I ran it on the current revision as of 21:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC) which is [2]. It has 4394 characters of prose. 883*5=4415. Which means the article needs 21 more characters of prose. Cheers,  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 21:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
  •  On hold until article gains 21 more characters of prose.  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 21:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Was this nom really held up for 16 goddamn characters? EEng (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 Done 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:09, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Article is at 5x now. QPQ done, interesting hook, article cited. All good!  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 21:15, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK is not the appropriate place to discuss notability Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I hate to bring this up at this late point, but can another experienced editor check WP:N against WP:ARTIST? To me it looks very weak, but I hope I'm wrong. If there's any question I think this nom better go on hold for a trip to AfD. EEng (talk) 21:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Added lots of citations. I am involved, but IMHO it is WP:Notable clearly. He is nationally a recognized 'go to' artist when heroic depictions are the object, particularly involving sports figures. e.g. Simonto, Jesse (July 15, 2010). "UF to honor Heisman winners with bronze statues: UF's three Heisman Trophy winners, Tim Tebow, Danny Wuerffel and Steve Spurrier, will be commemorated with statues outside the west side of Ben Hill Griffin Stadium". The Independent Florida Alligator. Retrieved August 20, 2014.. But feel free to get a third opinion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
I really do hope I'm wrong, but the problem is we need a source independent of him (i.e. not his website, not a gallery selling his work, not -- really -- a college president saying "The sculptor we selected for this statue of [person related to this school] is one of the greatest!") saying that. I don't see that. In fact, I've just now reviewed every source in the article and they're almost all exactly the same in their coverage of Proctor: "The sculpture is by Stanly Proctor, who has lots of experience with sports figures." And that's it.

There's something you should consider very carefully. If notability is going to be a problem, even a potential one, it's best dealt with now. AfD discussions can be embarrassing for the subject, and it would be all the more embarrassing after a main-page appearance than before. So let's make sure first. Do any other editors think a trip to AfD is warranted? EEng (talk) 02:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Well he definitely notable per WP:ARTIST. It states "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." Tell me if I'm wrong but his works has (at least) became a significant monument his recieved multiple reviews. Cheers,  ΤheQ Editor  Talk? 21:25, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Um, what reviews? (Please give names of authors, or article title, or url, but not ref# from the article since ref #s shift around as the article is edited.) EEng (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
  • Temporarily on hold while article is at AfD, although it seems almost certain to be kept; approval can be restored once AfD has concluded (assuming article still exists). BlueMoonset (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
  • The AfD has concluded. Promoting to Prep 4. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/W._Stanley_Proctor&oldid=1022911767"