Template:Did you know nominations/Theft of The Weeping Woman from the National Gallery of Victoria

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 17:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Theft of The Weeping Woman from the National Gallery of Victoria

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the theft of The Weeping Woman from the National Gallery of Victoria was the theft of the most expensive work purchased by an Australian art gallery and that the crime is still unsolved?

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Malolactic fermentation

Created/expanded by Shirt58 (talk). Self nominated at 13:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC).

• New enough, long enough, fully referenced. Hook verified against online sources. QPQ required as user has five DYKs.
  • Listed myself as a nom, and provided a review. Now needs to be be re-reviewed, as I can't approve my own noms. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

REVIEW COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Maile

• QPQ by Hawkeye7
• Article created by Shirt58 on June 15, 2013 and has 8527 characters of readable prose
• NPOV
• Hook is interesting, short enough and sourced at the end of the sentence
• Every paragraph sourced
• Eagwig @ toolserver found no copyvio

Good 2 Go. Nicely sourced and interesting article — Maile (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)