Template:Did you know nominations/The Anthropocene Reviewed

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

The Anthropocene Reviewed

Improved to Good Article status by Cerebral726 (talk) and Barkeep49 (talk). Nominated by Cerebral726 (talk) at 16:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - ALT1 is approved, but I'm going to suggest some more as slight modifications, as well.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: i fangirl for none. But for John Green's lovely, fantastic, and insightful The Anthropocene Reviewed, my inner Nerdfighter might just fawn a bit. Thank you for improving this to GA status! In my position as reviewer (of the DYK nomination for) The Anthropocene Reviewed, I give this nomination and its nominators five stars. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 02:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm glad you enjoy the nomination, I was excited I was able to help get it to GA status! I think "velociraptors" is a fun alternative. I originally chose Penguins of Madagascar because it made the list two things commonly reviewed (a movie and a place to eat) followed by something you wouldn't expect to be reviewed, but I think highlighting the weirdness of the review topics right away is a great option. I would be happy with any of the alts. Thanks for your review! --13:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)