Template:Did you know nominations/Straight, Incorporated

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:46, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Straight, Incorporated edit

  • Comment: Article was stubbed due to POV/OR concerns. This is an expansion of the stub.

Created/expanded by GabrielF (talk). Self nom at 22:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Interesting edit history. Is the article stable yet? Because if it's not, then it's not suitable for DYK. We can't have edit warring whilst it's on the main page. It would be good if both the main contributors could comment here, outlining that they are both happy with where the article is at. Schwede66 05:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
  • For the time being, the article is not stable. Let us know when you've got it sorted. Schwede66 04:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
  • The article has been stable for a good week now and I'm hopeful that the edit battles have ceased. So it's now ready for review. Schwede66 18:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you for keeping an eye on this nomination. We had some editors who were inexperienced with policies regarding sourcing but I think everyone's on the same page now. GabrielF (talk) 21:43, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Article is stable now. Measuring expansion is "interesting" due to the extensive history, but it's definitely 5x expanded above any pre-existing semi-decent version. A good job on a difficult topic. AGF on hook fact and plagiarism issues, as the sources are largely offline. Hook is interesting. --Orlady (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)