Template:Did you know nominations/Riverside and Avondale

The following is an archived discussion of Riverside and Avondale's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC).

Riverside and Avondale edit

(

)

... that the Jacksonville neighborhood of Riverside and Avondale is the most architecturally diverse neighborhood in Florida?

Reviewed: Slavery in Haiti
Comment: Moved from userspace on March 2, 2013.[1] The hook paraphrases Wayne Wood's Jacksonville's Architectural Heritage, p. 110: "Today, the neighborhood has the largest variety of architectural styles in Florida".

Created by Cuchullain (talk). Self nominated at 18:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC).

That's a good piece of work. Comprehensive new article. I've checked a handful of online sources for close paraphrasing and all was ok. AGF for hook fact. The referencing is extensive, but here's my only little concern: the article uses footnotes and references, and the same author is listed in the refs twice with publications from different years. Therefore, the footnotes should really identify which of those references are referred to. The way to do it is with the shortened footnotes template, I've done a sample edit of one of them, and when the others are done as well, this deserves the big tick. Schwede 66 18:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Unfortunately this is one of those technical aspects that's over my head even after all these years. I've added shortened footnotes for the books; I don't know if they need to be there for the news and web cites, but I'll figure out how to add them if necessary.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

As far as I can see, all the remaining cites refer to the book, so just edit them the way I did the first footnote for you. Schwede 66 21:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Well done. Good to go. Schwede 66 21:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)