Template:Did you know nominations/Rashid Mahdi

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Z1720 (talk) 01:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Rashid Mahdi

An example of Rashid Mahdi's "hidden treasures"
An example of Rashid Mahdi's "hidden treasures"

Created by Munfarid1 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC).

  • At the time the nomination was made, the article was new enough and long enough. It's neutral, with in-line citations to reputable sources, including some online ones. The photos in the article are okay to use. The only issue Earwig throws up is a quote from the source. The hook length and content works. Munfarid1, I see that you've received credits for 7 DYK hooks now, so this one just needs a QPQ, and it will be good to go. Ping me when you've done one, and I'll approve this. MeegsC (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi @MeegsC: - thanks for your assistance, but the identical passages from the source in the article are clearly marked as quotes, with attribution. - I thought, this is allowed? Munfarid1 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Munfarid1, the quotes are fine; there's no issue there. I'm sorry that my wording was unclear. I only included the link so that the promoter can see for themselves that there is no copyright violation. :) The only thing you need to do is a QPQ. MeegsC (talk) 21:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I updated the nomination template to include your QPQ, Munfarid1. Thanks for letting me know you'd done it. This one is good to go. MeegsC (talk) 18:33, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
@Munfarid1 and MeegsC: I want to promote this to an image slot, so ALT1, and want to ask if the quotation is necessary. Using a quotation in a hook suggests that is the focus of the hook, but here it's just someone's description of old backrooms... couldn't we just say "old backrooms" to keep it brief and not distract? Kingsif (talk) 16:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Kingsif, personally I think saying "in the dusty backrooms of several stores" would be fine, but I'll leave it up to Munfarid1. MeegsC (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Kingsif and MeegsC, I agree, we can say "in the dusty backrooms of several stores". Do I have to write a new hook for that, or can Kingsif (talk take care of this, to make things quicker? Anyway, thanks to both of you!Munfarid1 (talk) 20:33, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
It should be fine. Kingsif (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Putting ALT2, which was approved by nominator, reviewer and one potential promoter as okay:

  • ALT2:... that hidden treasures (see example) by Sudanese visual artist Rashid Mahdi were discovered by French photographer Claude Inverné in the dusty backrooms of several stores?

and reticking, since the previous tick may have been lost among the text. MeegsC (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

MeegsC, Kingsif, Munfarid1 I was going to promote this hook, but I have concerns about "hidden treasures". The hook implies that Mahdi's body of work is called "hidden treasures" but the source uses this phrase as a descriptor, not a title of his work. An alternate hook is proposed below:

  • ALT2a:... that the work of Sudanese visual artist Rashid Mahdi (example pictured) was discovered by French photographer Claude Inverné in the dusty backrooms of several stores?

Is ALT2a an acceptable hook? Z1720 (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Looks good to me Kingsif (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Z1720 Yes, this is fine by me, too. Thanks and please go ahead with the promotion.Munfarid1 (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)