Template:Did you know nominations/Protected areas of Vietnam
The following is an archived discussion of Protected areas of Vietnam's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 11:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Protected areas of Vietnam edit
- ... that in the Protected areas of Vietnam, Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park (pictured cave in the park) has the largest cave in the world?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lasjia
Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 01:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC).
- Suggested alternative wording ALT1:
- ... that Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, one of the protected areas of Vietnam, has the largest cave (detail pictured) in the world? Gatoclass (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks.ALT1: Hook sounds better. --Nvvchar. 16:51, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Length, history and reference verified. However, at the very least we should delink all the section headers per MOS:HEAD. And I really wonder if this article is trying to be what List of national parks of Vietnam should be. I'd expect an article on the "protected areas of ..." somewhere to generally discuss the protected areas with sections discussing the types of protected areas in general (which wouldn't rule out this hook, actually) and hatnote links to a list of the specific areas. Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's essentially a detailed list of national parks in prose form. That's not essential for DYK is it now? I've delinked the headers.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
True, it can go now, but note that someone made a similar observation on the talk page and we should try to fix this later. Daniel Case (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
