Template:Did you know nominations/Murray Hill, Christmas Island
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Murray Hill, Christmas Island edit
- ... that 63% of Murray Hill on Christmas Island is a national park?
5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk), Bonkers The Clown (talk), Gilderien (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk). Nominated by Gilderien (talk) at 22:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC).
- Comment I helped propose a hook; hope y'all like it. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Gilderien, please don't do this again. We work together as a team and generally allow at least 3 days for Rosie and myself to edit articles before nomming. If eveyrbody has edited it within a day then it will be nommed but not until everybody's inputs have been added!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:43, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh ok thank you I won't do it again.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 18:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the narrowest section of Christmas Island is through Murray Hill, and its highest point is the hill's summit? --Rosiestep (talk) 05:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Well the article is now certainly big enough and expanded enough, from 30 April to May 3. There are enough citations. No plagiarism found. However I am dubious about how many different people are listed here. They all seem to have played a part, but can we award 20% of a credit? Should I insist on each person doing a QPQ? I will check User:Gilderien for the QPQ requirement. Some of the others are quite regular appearances here! - - deleted wrong statement - - Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what exactly do you mean? I carried as the QPQ review as required.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 11:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah OK I see there is a QPQ, sorry. review continues. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hook(s) are short enough, original hook is a bit boring, but alt1 looks OK for interest. However although alt1 hook is in the article split in two places, the part about it being the highest point on the island is not cited. So we need this fact to have a proven citation before approval. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Cited.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 11:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
good to go with alt1 only. (This reference proves the original hook was a misunderstanding between the hill and the island, so I will be removing that statement). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
