- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 16:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Julian Moynahan
- ... that a reviewer wrote of Julian Moynahan that he was "disguised as an English professor at Rutgers", but really "a nonstop Irish-American storyteller"?
Source: "Books: Lost in the Stacks", Time, 22 August 1969- Reviewed: Popcom
Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 06:09, 19 November 2022 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- n - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
DYK requires every section to be referenced, so the sections Literary criticism and Novels need references. SL93 (talk) 15:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review, SL93, but those are just lists of books, so your point seems mistaken. As Vanamonde93 said when someone tried to run this argument once before, “The fundamental rule for DYK is that it needs to be policy-compliant; in this case, compliant with WP:V. Books are acceptable sources for the content within them, and are therefore acceptable sources for their existence, when they have complete publication information. Secondary sources would be ideal for determining whether the works should be listed at all; but that's more of a due weight determination that is outside the scope of a DYK review.” So each title, with publisher and date, cites itself. Moonraker (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)