Template:Did you know nominations/Gill and Coote v El Vino Co Ltd

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Gill and Coote v El Vino Co Ltd

(

)

El Vino, in 2009

... that between 1945 and a 1982 court case women were not permitted to stand at the bar at El Vino in London? Source: "Today in 1982, El Vino, a traditional Fleet Street bar, lifted its ban on two women from standing with male colleagues at the bar ... The ban on women standing at the bar was thought to date back to the second world war" from: Rodrigues, Jason (15 November 2012). "30 years ago today: El Vino lifted ban on women standing with male colleagues at bar". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 September 2022. and "the rule against women at the bar dates only from 1945" from: "Women Win Right to Stand, Sip at Bar". Edmonton Journal. 10 November 1982. p. 76.
- ALT1: ... that until a 1982 legal decision women were not permitted to stand at the bar at El Vino in London? Source: as ALT0
- ALT2: ... that a policy preventing women from standing at the bar at London's El Vino was only overturned after the fourth legal action under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975? Source: "Miss Coote and Mrs GIll, whose action, the fourth against El Vino under the act" from Nicholson, David (16 July 1981). "Court blow to wine bar feminists". The Times. No. 60981. p. 5.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/MacEnhancer

Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 07:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. ALT1 preferred. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

There were protests of this nature in Australia, where women chained themselves to the bar. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)