Template:Did you know nominations/French submarine Perle (1935)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

French submarine Perle (1935)

edit
sister ship Diamant, date unknown
sister ship Diamant, date unknown

Created by L293D (talk). Self-nominated at 02:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @L293D: There are a couple sentences that look copy-pasted from [1]. Several source inconsistencies (navypedia mentioned Jan 1931 laid down, uboat.net mentioned Jul 1931). I'm also concerned that the article looks generic for Saphir-class submarines instead of Perle, and a "Service history" section would probably help much. There are also statements I can't quite find in the sources cited inline:
* The Sulzer manufacturer
* Source mentions a beam of 7.2, not 7.1
* Not sure where pretty much the entire second paragraph of the Design section is from, can you elaborate?
Juxlos (talk) 12:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

  • @Juxlos: Thanks for the review. I've fixed the copy-paste problem, removed the Sulzer manufacturer, fixed the beam size, and changed the laid down date to 1931. The second paragraph is a generic para from Saphir-class submarine as is the first para. I agree that a "Service history" section would be nice, but unfortunately I can't find much in the sources I have access to. I could try and stretch the information I have and create a Service history section, but it would mostly amount to moving the info from the lead down. L293D ( • ) 12:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @L293D: Maybe get some details about its last trip? I think one of the sources mentioned several trips it took and the one where it sank. Juxlos (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  • Nice! The article looks significantly better now. Juxlos (talk) 14:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @L293D: You will need to address the maintenance tags in the article before it can be promoted. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: I've added one reference and removed the other badly-sourced paragraph. L293D ( • ) 15:53, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Restoring tick now that the issues have been fixed. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)