Template:Did you know nominations/Church of the Holy Trinity, Embleton

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 22:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Church of the Holy Trinity, Embleton edit

(

)

... that the stained glass windows in the chancel of the Church of the Holy Trinity (pictured) in Embleton, England are by Charles Eamer Kempe?

Created/expanded by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 23:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Offline citation AGF, although I did wonder whether the hook was slightly inaccurate based on the article - from the article, I gathered that Kempe's windows are just in the chancel? Bob talk 08:54, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Article review for Church of the Holy Trinity, Embleton
Length	Newness	Adequate citations	Formatted citations	Reliable sources	Neutrality	Plagiarism
Bob talk	Bob talk	Bob talk	Bob talk	Bob talk	Bob talk	Bob talk

I added chancel to the hook for clarity. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, ready to go. Bob talk 20:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Please review this line for plagiarism from here

A west window commemorates the 1952 Coronation of Elizabeth II, while a north wall window by is dedicated to a Merton College vicar.

Wording is taken directly from the source, and it should not be difficult to rephrase this in our own words. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

- Should be fixed now, but I'm not sure "committed" would be the best word to replace the north wall's window. HurricaneFan 25 17:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
  - "Committed" clearly isn't the right word, so I've fixed your fix. But here's what really gets me: the article is full of rubbish like "features windows containing with excellent specimens of stained glass". Do reviewers not actually read the article? Malleus Fatuorum 17:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
    - I suspect that, like some of the other prose errors seen, that could be an artefact of cut-and-paste editing that missed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)