Template:Did you know nominations/Casa del Arte (Concepción, Chile)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 23:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Casa del Arte (Concepción, Chile) edit

(

)

... that the Casa del Arte (pictured) of Concepción, Chile, has the largest collection of Chilean art and the second largest collection of paintings in the country?

Created by Yngvadottir (talk), Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk), and Dr. Blofeld (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 10:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC).

Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Flashback (2013 video game)

Created 2013-06-14;sufficient length (7213B); hook is interesting enough; the refs seem legit, though there are some unreffed parts, including an entire paragraph (the rules state "Articles with good references and citations are preferred"...but I suppose not being fully referenced isn't against the rules?). Curly Turkey (gobble) 07:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

if the ref were at the end of the para (in question: Architecture and fittings), I would have no objection as it would be assumed that the ref pertains to the entire para. But for this section, what we are seeing is an uncited last few lines for the paragraph on Architecture and Fittings. WP:V says it all. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I have addressed the issue of the ref position. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Also uncited: It is one of the major cultural centers of Greater Concepción and one of the major tourist destinations in the Bío Bío Region. Thanks. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 06:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

I removed that sentence as I'm on vacation and not able to sort through all references. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Are there any other issues? --Rosiestep (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Now that most certainly would do ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 08:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)