Template:Did you know nominations/Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 04:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain edit

(

)

... that the U.S. Congress and President both had to give approval to build the Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain (pictured), which memorializes two men who died in the sinking of the Titanic?

ALT1:... that because William Howard Taft lost the 1912 U.S. presidential election, there was no ceremony to dedicate the Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain (pictured), which memorializes two men who died in the sinking of the Titanic?

Created/expanded by Tim1965 (talk). Nominated by Orlady (talk) at 15:42, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

This article is good to go! The prose length, date of creation, and the sources (those that I could locate on Google Books and Google News) check out and meet DYK criteria. I assume good faith on the offline sources cited in the article. I prefer the second hook, but both are formatted properly and cited in the text. --Caponer (talk) 03:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Striking ALT1, since at 221 characters including spaces it is well over the maximum length of a DYK hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Here's a shorter version:

ALT1A:... that because U.S. President Taft lost the 1912 election, there was no ceremony to dedicate the Butt-Millet Memorial Fountain (pictured), which memorializes two men who died on the Titanic? --Orlady (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Looks good; don't know why I couldn't think of doing that last night. Orthography question: the article title and infobox gives the name of the fountain in italics: is this because it's a work of art and that's its official title? If so, shouldn't it be listed that way throughout the article ... and in the hook? The article should be consistent with itself, and DYK should agree with the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

The italicized title seems to be a consequence of the infobox, which is based on Template:Infobox artwork. There might be other suitable infobox templates that could be used instead that wouldn't force the title to be italicized. It's the infobox that needs to be fixed; the article and DYK should not be forced to conform with the choices made by the creator of an infobox template. --Orlady (talk) 19:35, 23 May 2012 (UTC) I fixed it. --Orlady (talk) 19:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)