Template:Did you know nominations/Burevestnik (1906)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 08:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Burevestnik (1906)

edit

Created by Soman (talk). Nominated by Yoninah (talk) at 17:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Both articles are long enough and new enough. QPQs are done. Both articles are amply footnoted; I don't see copyvios. The ALT2 hook is supported by a cited source and is inherent in the articles. However, it's a peculiar hook. I suggest separate hooks for the two articles; I believe both are supported:
  • I like Orlady's idea to split the hooks, and her hook suggestions are excellent. Both hook refs are verified and cited inline. Everything else checks out per Orlady's review. ALT3 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 18:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • The hook needs a source directly after it, which I can't add as the sources are offline. When this is done, I will re-instate a tick. Thanks, Matty.007 11:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Done (The source is online, by the way.) Yoninah (talk) 13:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes, now sourced correctly. Thanks, Matty.007 19:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)