Template:Did you know nominations/Babette's

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Babette's edit

  • ... that police always tipped off the owner of Babette's Supper Club before they raided the illegal casino in the back, and gamblers escaped through a trap door in the horse-betting room?
  • ALT1 ... that police always tipped off the owner of Babette's Supper Club before they raided its illegal backroom casino, and gamblers escaped through a trap door?

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk) and We hope (talk). Nominated by Yoninah (talk) at 18:39, 6 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment only Shorter ALT1 added. Edwardx (talk) 22:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @Edwardx: thank you. But I think it's important to add "in the back", so I did. Yoninah (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks Yoninah. I should have read the article first! By "in the back", I had wrongly inferred that the police came in the back way, whereas the illegal casino itself was in the back room. But, that does mean that there is ambiguity. Perhaps "before they raided its backroom illegal casino". "Backroom" appears to be an okay word, at least in American English. What do you think? Edwardx (talk) 00:22, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @Edwardx: Yes, thank you, that works even better. I adjusted ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 09:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  • The power of collaborative editing! Edwardx (talk) 10:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Full review needed. Yoninah (talk) 00:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Review by Maile
QPQ
  • QPQ provided
Eligibility
  • Article created by Dr. Blofeld on August 4, 2016 has 4118 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph sourced inline
  • Citations are appropriately formatted
  • No bare URLs
Hook
  • Hook is interesting and "hooky"
  • ALT1 is 153 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced
Image
  • No image used in the hook.
Tools
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "false positive" in that it flagged listed sources as copyvios.
  • Labs Dup Detector is currently not functional.
  • Dab solver (Disambig links tool) says there are no disambiguation links in the article
  • Checklinks showed no external link issues.
Nomination passes. — Maile (talk) 20:55, 18 August 2016 (UTC)