Template:Did you know nominations/Aracy Amaral

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Premeditated Chaos talk 13:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Aracy Amaral

Moved to mainspace by Miraclepine (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

ミラP@Miraclepine 02:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC).

  • Long enough, new enough. Hook's cruising for a pruning (I'd WP:DYKTRIM "who" and everything after "Brazil") but ultimately checks out in full, as does the QPQ. Earwig has no valid complaints. As written, the Biography section would deserve {{very long section}} and I think this should be rectified.--Launchballer 08:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • @Launchballer: I don't know about this... that the work was vital in its area rests on not having a lot of English-language translations in order to be quirky enough; though I've added one ALT in case, as well as another with better grammar. I've added the requested section headers in the meantime.
  • ALT0A: ... that a historian lamented the lack of English-language translations for the work of Aracy Amaral? Same as ALT0
  • ALT0B: ... that a historian lamented the lack of English-language translations for the work of Aracy Amaral despite it being "a vital reference for the study of art history in Brazil"?Same as ALT0
ミラP@Miraclepine 19:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for splitting the Biography section, both ALT0a and ALT0b work. Let's roll.--Launchballer 11:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)